Diferencias entre las revisiones 53 y 67 (abarca 14 versiones)

EDADISMO

Fenómeno definido por la OMS como los estereotipos, los prejuicios y la discriminación hacia las personas debido a su edad. Se trata de una práctica, no solo injusta socialmente, sino profundamente incoherente a tenor de la situación demográfica.

El edadismo surge cuando se utiliza la edad para clasificar y dividir a las personas de una forma que produce un daño, desventaja o injusticia.
El edadismo se ejerce en contra de las personas jóvenes y de las personas mayores.
Cuando se produce la discriminación hacia personas mayores se lo llama viejismo. Es un tipo de discriminación que pasa desapercibida.
Aun cuando es una de las primeras formas de discriminación en el mundo, junto con raza y con género, hablamos muy poco de lo que significa la discriminación por edad.

SEGUIR VIENDO: edadismo interpersonal

Qué es el edadismo: la discriminación hacia personas mayores que pasa desapercibida

Siete Estrellas

30/01/2024
https://siete-estrellas.com/que-es-el-edadismo-la-discriminacion-hacia-personas-mayores-que-pasa-desapercibida/
El paso del tiempo es una constante en la vida de todos los seres humanos. Con cada año que pasa, acumulamos experiencias y conocimiento. Sin embargo, al contrario de antaño, cuando la figura de los mayores era sinónimo de sabio, ahora en muchas sociedades la edad se ha convertido en una etiqueta que categoriza y segrega, dando lugar a lo que conocemos como edadismo. Este fenómeno, aunque menos conocido que otras formas de discriminación, es igualmente injusto y merece nuestra atención y esfuerzo para detenerlo.

Según el primer Informe Mundial sobre Edadismo de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), el edadismo es más común de lo que creemos. De hecho, la mitad de la población mundial sostiene actitudes discriminatorias contra las personas mayores. En Europa, el único continente donde se han recopilado datos de manera extensiva, una de cada tres personas dice haber experimentado edadismo. Estas cifras son alarmantes y subrayan la necesidad de acciones concretas para abordar esta forma de discriminación.

¿Qué es el edadismo y cómo se manifiesta? El edadismo es un término que describe los estereotipos (cómo pensamos), los prejuicios (cómo nos sentimos) y la discriminación (cómo actuamos) hacia las personas en función de su edad. Este fenómeno puede afectar a individuos de todas las edades y puede manifestarse de diversas maneras. Puede ser tan evidente como un joven siendo ridiculizado por tratar de iniciar un movimiento político, o tan sutil como una persona mayor siendo pasada por alto para una oportunidad de empleo debido a su edad.

Tipos de edadismo y estrategias para combatirlos El edadismo puede adoptar varias formas, incluido el institucional, el interpersonal y el autoinfligido. Cada uno de estos requiere un enfoque diferente para su erradicación.

Edadismo Institucional El edadismo institucional se refiere a las políticas, normas y prácticas de las instituciones que limitan las oportunidades y causan daño a las personas en función de su edad. Para luchar contra esta forma de edadismo, es crucial fortalecer las políticas y leyes que lo prohíben a nivel local, nacional e internacional. Además, es necesario establecer mecanismos de vigilancia que aseguren la implementación efectiva de estas leyes y la promoción de la igualdad y los derechos humanos.

Edadismo Interpersonal Este tipo de edadismo ocurre en las interacciones cotidianas y puede manifestarse de varias maneras, como el trato condescendiente hacia los mayores o la exclusión de los jóvenes en la toma de decisiones. La educación y el contacto intergeneracional son herramientas clave para combatir el edadismo interpersonal. Es fundamental desmentir mitos y reducir prejuicios proporcionando información precisa y ejemplos positivos que desafíen los estereotipos arraigados.

Edadismo Autoinfligido A veces, los prejuicios y estereotipos están tan internalizados que las propias personas se limitan a sí mismas basándose en su edad. Un ejemplo común es la creencia de que las personas mayores no pueden aprender nuevas habilidades o emprender nuevos pasatiempos.

Es esencial reconocer y valorar el papel de los mayores en la sociedad, empoderándolos para mejorar su autoconcepto, autonomía y autoestima. La discriminación por edad autoinfligida puede tener un impacto significativo en la salud y el bienestar, y debe ser abordada con sensibilidad y apoyo.

En busca de eliminar la discriminación En Siete Estrellas – SocialMente, estamos comprometidos con la lucha contra todo tipo de discriminación. Creemos que la riqueza de la experiencia humana se encuentra en todas las etapas de la vida y que cada persona merece ser valorada y respetada independientemente de su edad.

Quizá, porque a veces como sociedad tendemos a pensar que las personas mayores ya han recorrido su camino en el perfil socioeducativo y no tiene que ser así.

En Siete Estrellas – SocialMente hemos realizado proyectos con personas mayores que nos han dejado varias enseñanzas, como nos explicaba Rebeca Brandi, directora de proyectos de Siete Estrellas – SocialMente:

“Posiblemente, el grueso de proyectos de esta índole están dirigidos a otros colectivos. Ya que se presupone que los centros de Mayores, Centros de día, residencias, etc… cubren esta necesidad, y en cierta forma es cierto, ya que tienen un amplio abanico de actividades, pero no llegan a todas las personas mayores, ya sea por desconocimiento, por la imposibilidad de acceder a ellas (pocas plazas, lejanía del centro o imposibilidad de salir del propio domicilio) Es importante tener en cuenta que cada colectivo tiene su propia realidad y necesidades derivadas de esta, y tenemos que trabajar para poder adaptar los proyectos para poder dar una respuesta a partir de la realidad y no de lo que creemos que necesitan”

Para promover este cambio, es vital que se implementen proyectos intergeneracionales que fomenten el entendimiento y el respeto entre jóvenes y mayores. Es igualmente importante que las organizaciones, empresas y gobiernos adopten políticas y prácticas que reconozcan y celebren la diversidad de edades.

Desde Siete Estrellas – SocialMente, hemos realizado también proyectos con personas mayores que nos ayudan a mejorar como organización, al enfrentarnos a nuevos retos y conocer mejor nuevos contextos de los que extraer enseñanzas. Si quieres conocer mejor nuestra labor, te la contamos aquí.

Tres estrategias para reducir el edadismo
OPS (2021) Informe mundial sobre edadismo. file:///C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/9789275324455_spa%20(6).pdf
Página 19- Se ha demostrado la eficacia de tres estrategias para reducir el edadismo: las políticas y la

legislación, las actividades educativas y las intervenciones de contacto intergeneracional.

• Estrategia 1: Políticas y legislación. Las políticas y la legislación pueden ser

útiles para reducir el edadismo contra cualquier grupo de edad. Entre ellas cabe mencionar, por ejemplo, políticas y leyes que aborden la discriminación y la desigualdad por motivos de la edad, y la legislación relativa a los derechos humanos. El fortalecimiento de las políticas y las leyes contra el edadismo puede lograrse mediante la adopción de instrumentos a nivel local, nacional o internacional, y la modificación de los instrumentos vigentes que permitan la discriminación por motivos de edad. Esta estrategia requiere mecanismos de observancia y órganos de seguimiento a nivel nacional e internacional que aseguren la aplicación efectiva de las políticas y leyes que abordan la discriminación, la desigualdad y los derechos humanos.

• Estrategia 2: Intervenciones educativas. Las intervenciones educativas para

reducir el edadismo deben incluirse en todos los niveles y tipos de educación, desde la escuela primaria hasta la universidad, y en contextos educativos formales y no formales. Las actividades educativas ayudan a mejorar la empatía, disipar las ideas erróneas sobre los distintos grupos de edad, y reducir los prejuicios y la discriminación al proporcionar información precisa y ejemplos para contrarrestar los estereotipos.

• Estrategia 3: Intervenciones de contacto intergeneracional. Asimismo,

habría que invertir en intervenciones de contacto intergeneracional que tengan por objeto fomentar la interacción entre las personas de distintas generaciones. Este contacto puede reducir los prejuicios y los estereotipos entre grupos. Las intervenciones de contacto intergeneracional figuran entre las intervenciones más eficaces para reducir el edadismo contra las personas mayores, y también son prometedoras para reducir el edadismo contra las personas más jóvenes.

La edad ya no sirve para identificar la vejez CAMBIOS SOCIALES Y ENVEJECIMIENTO

VER TAMBIÉN madurescencia y mayorescencia
LA EDAD Y LA PERCEPCIÓN DE LA EDAD.
https://www.ambito.com/lifestyle/bienestar/estudio-la-gente-deja-sentirse-joven-antes-empezar-sentirse-vieja-n5034573
SEGUIR Completar con texto para Campa
¿A QUÉ EDAD SE EMPIEZA A SER VIEJO?
Este maravilloso video de la AARP Foundation, muestra claramente la diferencia entre lo que las personas piensan de la vejez y lo que realmente es.
https://faes.org.co/a-que-edad-se-empieza-a-ser-viejo/

https://guillemrecolons.com/seniors-la-paradoja-del-edadismo/

NOTAS 03.05.2024

Hay una nueva longevidad, que puede aprender de la antigua vejez.
Resulta paradójico que la prolongación de la vida de las personas —que ha sido un sueño largamente acariciado por los seres humanos— haya acabado convirtiéndose en una pesadilla. Esto es a causa, en parte, del tipo de análisis que se ha venido realizando. El incremento del volumen y proporción de las personas mayores no aparece ya como un logro, sino como una carga social. Y esta percepción viene a constituir el problema principal de la vejez, tal y como es denunciado por los investigadores/as que habiendo sido pioneros llegan a esa etapa de la vida (Laslett, 1991).
En España han surgido en los últimos años empresas que se dedican al

asesoramiento y planificación de los servicios y atención de las necesidades específicas de las personas de más edad. En parte esta novedad se debe a que se considera una actividad rentable. Desde un punto de vista pragmático, en el mundo de los negocios se tiene en cuenta algo que en el análisis teórico de los diferentes especialistas en ocasiones se descuida: que la vejez es una realidad dinámica, en cambio constante. Es además una realidad cuya prognosis apunta hacia una vejez «joven» y con recursos.

Hay otro factor que contribuye también a configurar la llamada perspectiva catastrofista de un mundo envejecido: es el rechazo a la vejez y a los rasgos con que se la asocia. Se trata también del terror (y el tabú) que suscita, al igual que la muerte, a la que aparece unida.
Un error que suele cometerse es considerar a las personas ancianas (de 65 años y más) como un grupo homogéneo. En esta concepción se descuidan las diferencias por clase social existentes al igual que en cualquier otro grupo. Son también importantes las diferencias debidas a la pertenencia a los distintos subgrupos de edad y, sobre todo, por género (varón/mujer).
Al hablar de las personas en edades comprendidas entre los cero y los 40 años se suelen realizar distinciones según los tramos de edad diferentes en que se encuentran. ¿Por qué se tiende a homogeneizar a las personas de

«65 y más años» con las de 80, 90 o incluso 100 años? En la definición social de la vejez se observa un rechazo a la hora de realizar estas matizaciones, puede que bajo el influjo de la percepción negativa, aversión y temor que suscita la vejez. La definición de vejez en función de la edad cronológica resulta un criterio insatisfactorio. Existen formas diversas de envejecer, diversas «carreras».

Las causas que han originado la extensión de esa perspectiva negativa de la ancianidad son varias.
Se pueden imponer nuevos modelos y adoptarse otras fórmulas de financiación de la pensiones y de la seguridad social, así como concepciones nuevas del trabajo y del ocio.
Todo ello sin olvidar la elaboración creciente de unos valores distintos, más humanistas y más adaptados a las nuevas realidades económicas y sociales.
Es en el último tramo de la vida donde los problemas de salud y

bienestar resultan más llamativos. El relativo buen mantenimiento de la salud hasta edades más avanzadas, para caer luego, está siendo observado con regularidad. Incluso se aprecia a través de las encuestas acerca de la percepción de la salud (Bazo, 1990¿z: 35). Tener en cuenta todas esas cuestiones conduce a considerar que el que los seres humanos estén destinados a la longevidad no debe conllevar la condena a la decrepitud.

Existe un límite biológico para la vida humana que se sitúa actualmente

hacia los 120 años.

El vivir cada vez más y en mejores condiciones {añadir años a la vida y

añadir vida a los años, según la OMS), pone sobre el tapete la importancia de los factores económicos y sociales y, por tanto, la necesidad de seguir manteniendo o incrementando en ciertos grupos la calidad de vida.

El efecto cohorte se asocia a factores que afectan a una generación y provoca cambios en las tasas de magnitud diferente en sucesivos grupos de edad, en sucesivos períodos.
Dentro de esta línea de ideología democrática, considera que

entre investigador/a y grupo investigado debe establecerse una comunicación «en pie de igualdad» que no sea sólo correcta metodológicamente, sino que resulte también humanamente significativa. Abogando así por una técnica de la escucha (Ferrarotti, 1990: 46).

EDADISMO

Edadismo significado: Discriminación por edad
El edadismo es la tercera causa de discriminación a nivel mundial, después del racismo y el sexismo.
Ageism is the third cause of discrimination worldwide, after racism and sexism.
Erdman Palmore, The Ageism Survey: First Findings, The Gerontologist, Volume 41, Issue 5, 1 October 2001, Pages 572–575,https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/41.5.572
Ageism has been called the ultimate prejudice, the last discrimination, the cruelest rejection. I believe it is the third great “ism” in our society, after racism and sexism. Like racism and sexism, it is prejudice or discrimination against a category of people—in this case, against older people (Butler, 1995).
Bengtson,V. & Whittington,F (2014) From Ageism to the Longevity Revolution: Robert Butler, Pioneer, The Gerontologist, Volume 54, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages 1064–1069, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu100
Vern L. Bengtson, Frank J. Whittington, From Ageism to the Longevity Revolution: Robert Butler, Pioneer, The Gerontologist, Volume 54, Issue 6, December 2014, Pages 1064–1069, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu100
In the future, he predicted, “more individuals will be seen who are old in years but functionally young” (Birrenet al., 1963, p. 316).
“None of us know whether we have already had the best years of our lives, or whether the best are yet to come” (Butler, 1975, p. 141).

Conceptualizing ageism in parallel to sexism and racism The heuristic value and limitations of a common analytical framework
By Juliette Rennes
file:///C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/E_RFSP_706_0725.pdf
CITA: •Rennes, J. (2020). Conceptualizing ageism in parallel to sexism and racism: The heuristic value and limitations of a common analytical framework. Revue française de science politique, 70, 725-745. https://www.cairn-int.info/journal--2020-6-page-725.htm.
Some people may live their whole lives without directly experiencing racism or sexism. They are however likely at least once to have been considered too old to take part in some activity or other, to attend certain events, or to be eligible for an age-related benefit. This exclusion may be based on legal age limits or on social norms defining suitable activities at different ages.
Algunas personas pueden vivir toda su vida sin experimentar directamente el racismo o el sexismo. Sin embargo, es probable que al menos una vez se les haya considerado demasiado jovenes o demasiado mayores para participar en una actividad u otra, para asistir a determinados eventos o para tener derecho a una prestación relacionada con la edad. Esta exclusión puede basarse en límites de edad legales o en normas sociales que definen cuáles actividades son adecuadas en diferentes edades.

* pág: 14 Whatever its form, passing reveals age-dependent inequalities of opportunity and privilege. While in early twenty-first century North America and Europe the purpose of passing is almost always to make oneself, as an adult, look younger and not be seen as older, there is nothing universal or transhistorical about this identification of aging as a stigma. 5 It is in order to question and denaturalize such an assumption that some anti-ageist campaigners and groups—for example, in France, members of the Babayagas, Ménopause Rebelle, and Grey Pride—deliberately refer to themselves as “old,” rejecting euphemisms designed to avoid this description (such as seniors, older people, elders, or the third age). Here again, the example is provided by other stigmatized groups who have turned around, assumed, and reappropriated the derogatory labels assigned to them on the basis of their gender or sexual orientation (such as faggot, dyke, or slut). From this perspective, according to the American essayist and anti-ageism activist Ashton Applewhite, just as it is homophobia, sexism, and racism that make the lives of gays, women, and black people difficult (not their sexual orientation, skin color, or sexual organs), so it is the ageist structures of society, rather than advancing age, that constitute the main problem we face as we age. 6

pág 16: This fluidity of age affiliation over the course of one’s life limits the opportunity to

develop an “age consciousness,” which is a prerequisite for political identification with a given age, as the sociologist Maurice Halbwachs noted as early as 1938: “How can a collective consciousness emerge in a group that loses all of its members from one year to the next only to acquire entirely new ones?" 1 As for the development of a generational consciousness founded on the common experience of living through the same collective events at the same age, this does not in itself guarantee “age consciousness” since, on the contrary, with people of one’s own generation, as anthropologist Marc Augé notes, we do not see ourselves aging: moving together at the same time in the same direction makes us “unconscious of movement.” 2

Dino Buzzati, “Chasseurs de vieux,” [1966] in Dino Buzzati, Le K (Paris: Pocket, 2004) Diario de la guerra del cerdo es una novela del escritor argentino Adolfo Bioy Casares.Publicada en 1969.

https://www.cuidum.com/blog/edadismo-discriminacion-por-edad/
Seguir explorando
Tipos de edadismo que sufren los ancianos por razones de discriminación por edad En la profundización de su análisis sobre el edadismo, Robert Butler destaca la importancia de comprender los factores subyacentes que contribuyen a la perpetuación de esta forma de discriminación.
Identificó tres factores críticos:
El miedo a la muerte.
El auge de la cultura de la belleza y la juventud.
El énfasis en la productividad.
Estos elementos, profundamente arraigados en el tejido social, fomentan una valoración superficial basada en la apariencia física, la capacidad de rendimiento y la proximidad al final de la vida, promoviendo así una discriminación sistemática contra las personas mayores.
El miedo a la muerte lleva a una negación de la vejez, vista como un recordatorio constante de la mortalidad. Este temor se traduce en una resistencia cultural a aceptar el envejecimiento como una etapa natural de la vida.
Por otro lado, el auge de la cultura de la belleza y la juventud, amplificado por los medios de comunicación y la industria del entretenimiento, glorifica la juventud como el ideal de éxito y felicidad, marginando a aquellos que no se ajustan a estos cánones estéticos.
Finalmente, el énfasis en la productividad como medida del valor humano relega a las personas mayores, percibidas como menos productivas, a un estatus de menor importancia.
Esta confluencia de factores no solo perpetúa el edadismo sino que también influye en el comportamiento individual y colectivo en múltiples esferas de la vida, incluidas la familia, la educación, las relaciones personales y las prácticas profesionales. Estas actitudes arraigadas contribuyen a la marginalización y exclusión social de las personas mayores, reforzando la idea errónea de que su valor como individuos disminuye con la edad.

18 de marzo de 2021 https://www.who.int/es/news/item/18-03-2021-ageism-is-a-global-challenge-un
El edadismo conduce a una salud más pobre, al aislamiento social, a muertes tempranas y cuesta a las economías miles de millones de dólares: en un informe se pide actuar con rapidez para aplicar estrategias eficaces contra este problema
Organización Mundial de la Salud (2021) Informe Mundial sobre Edadismo
file:///C:/Users/Dell/Downloads/9789275324455_spa%20(4).pdf
CITA: Informe mundial sobre el edadismo. Washington, D.C.: Organización Panamericana de la Salud;

2021. Licencia: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. https://doi.org/10.37774/9789275324455.

P12 A lo largo del curso de vida, el edadismo interactúa con el capacitismo, el sexismo y el racismo, lo cual aumenta las desventajas.

El edadismo surge cuando se utiliza la edad para clasificar y dividir a las personas de una forma que produce un daño, desventaja o injusticia, y que erosiona la solidaridad intergeneracional.
tres dimensiones: estereotipos (pensamientos), prejuicios (sentimientos) y discriminación (acciones o comportamientos)
• Cuatro niveles en los que se manifiesta: el más amplio de la ideología, el institucional, el interpersonal y el internalizado o el edadismo autoinflingido que se da en el plano personal.
• dos formas de expresión: explícito (consciente) e implícito (inconsciente)
HISTÓRICAMENTE y en todas las sociedades para describir, categorizar y clasificar a las personas se ha tomado en cuenta la edad, el género y la raza. En función de estas pautas, las personas cumplen funciones y desempeñan roles en cada comunidad. El criterio de los ciclos vitales, por ejemplo, han servido para ordenar la sociedad.
Pero cuando se usan esos criterios para discriminar y excluir a las personas se causa un daño que las sociedades, a lo largo de los siglos, han querido limitar. De esa manera en el siglo XIX se trabajó para detener el racismo, y en el siglo XX para detener el sexismo focalizándose especialmente en las mujeres y niñas, en el XXI es el edadismo -el tercer “ismo”- el desafío que tenemos que afrontar. Detener el edadismo es la tarea.

LAS CUATRO "I" DEL EDADISMO

Hay 4 tipos de edadismo y las estrategias para detenerlo tienen que tomar en cuenta cada nivel.
EDADISMO IDEOLÓGICO. La ideología edadista difunde perspectivas negativas con respecto a la edad, son ideológicas que tienden a concebir a la vejez como una enfermedad. Esta ideología negativa de la vejez justifica la exclusión y el restringir la autonomía de las personas mayores. Una consecuencia de concebir la vejez como una enfermedad es el hecho de que la ancianidad esté medicalizada en todo el mundo occidental
EDADISMO INSTITUCIONAL El edadismo institucional se refiere a las leyes, regulaciones, normas sociales, políticas y prácticas de instituciones que limitan injustamente las oportunidades y perjudican sistemáticamente a las personas en función de su edad
EDADISMO INTERPERSONAL El edadismo interpersonal es el que se produce durante las interacciones entre dos o más personas.
EDADISMO INTERNALIZADO o edadismo auto inflijido,

EXPLICACIÓN

“I” ideología de que un grupo vale más que otro y se pone en práctica a través de la
“I” institucionalización Edadismo institucional de esa exclusión a través del poder, tu no te mereces este trabajo porque eres mayor
“I” interpersonal Edadismo interpersonal el plano interpersonal donde las bromas y el estigma van minando la autoconfianza y poco a poco se produce la
“I” internalización del edadismo, o edadismo autoinfligido se produce el autoedadismo, tu te crees que efectivamente vales menos que los otros por tu edad, te convences que no puedes luchar por tus derechos
Página 8. Los tres (CUATRO PARA KALACHE) niveles a los que se manifiesta el

edadismo están entrelazados y se potencian mutuamente (véase la figura 1.2). Las reglas, normas y prácticas institucionales edadistas, y las ideologías edadistas que fomentan, pueden configurar, y a la vez ser configuradas, por las actitudes personales (que subyacen en el edadismo interpersonal) 500 Internal Server Error

Internal Server Error

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator at [no address given] to inform them of the time this error occurred, and the actions you performed just before this error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.

-  ⇤ ← Versión 53 con fecha 2024-10-01 00:51:43 → 
  Tamaño: 134424
  Editor: MercedesJones
  Comentario:
+   ← Versión 67 con fecha 2025-07-07 01:33:20 → ⇥
  Tamaño: 226739
  Editor: MercedesJones
  Comentario:
-Los textos eliminados se marcan así.
+Los textos añadidos se marcan así.
 Línea 2:
+EDADISMO
 * Fenómeno definido por la OMS como los estereotipos, los prejuicios y la discriminación hacia las personas debido a su edad. Se trata de una práctica, no solo injusta socialmente, sino profundamente incoherente a tenor de la situación demográfica.
----
-Línea 5:
+Línea 8:
+ * Aun cuando es una de las primeras formas de discriminación en el mundo, junto con raza y con género, hablamos muy poco de lo que significa la discriminación por edad.
-Línea 78:
+Línea 82:
- * LA EDAD Y LA PERCEPCIÓN DE LA EDAD.
+ *''' LA EDAD Y LA PERCEPCIÓN DE LA EDAD.'''
-Línea 81:
+Línea 85:
- * ¿A QUÉ EDAD SE EMPIEZA A SER VIEJO?
+ * '''¿A QUÉ EDAD SE EMPIEZA A SER VIEJO?'''
-Línea 94:
+Línea 98:
- *  Hay otro factor que contribuye también a configurar la llamada perspectiva catastrofista de un mundo envejecido: es el rechazo a la vejez y a los rasgos con que se la asocia. Se trata también del terror (y el tabú) que suscita, al igual que la muerte, a la que aparece unida.
+ *  Hay otro factor que contribuye también a configurar la llamada '''perspectiva catastrofista''' de un mundo envejecido: es el rechazo a la vejez y a los rasgos con que se la asocia. Se trata también del terror (y el tabú) que suscita, al igual que la muerte, a la que aparece unida.
-Línea 1251:
+Línea 1255:
- * Hay controversias sobre si es válido hablar de edad subjetiva como algo diferente de la edad cronológica. lo que no se cuestiona es que efectivamente cada uno de nosotros sentimos la edad como un atributo personal, el sentirme más viejo o más jóven es algo que me ocurre a mí. Pero, lo que indican los datos es que pareciera que llega un momento en el que la edad deja de ser un dato relevante y se produce una discrepancia entre lo que sentimos y lo que marca nuestro Documento Nacional de Identidad DNI.
 * Curiosamente los científicos ecuentran que es posible medir la diferencia entre la edad cronológica y la edad funcional, llamada edad biológica y hablan del reloj epigénetico. La edad que tiene nuestro cuerpo.
 *  *  La pregunta sería ¿qué es lo que afecta nuestra percepción del tiempo en relación con nuestra propia vida?
 * Algunos estudios lo relacionan con el estrés, otros con la falta de perspectiva económica, otros plantean que las situaciones de crisis sociales influyen en nuestra percepción del futuro. Es como si se achicara el horizonte y nos quedaramos sin una perspectiva más lejana, se nos acorta la línea de la vida. Pero, estas situaciones no son permanentes y la percepción de juventud o vejez tampoco.   
 * Estamos frente las paradojas de la edad. Siendo jóvenes hay etapas en las que nos sentimos viejos. Curiosamente está demostrado que a medida que envejecemos nos sentimos más jóvenes. Al mismo tiempo, en un mundo de vidas de 100 años en cambio de ampliar nuestro horizonte vital lo achicamos. 
 * Lo importante es que no hay que preocuparse demasiado, estos cambios en la percepción de la edad son ciclos personales y sociales que varían naturalmente. Lo que sí conviene registrar es que no hay nada catastrófico en llegar a altas edades en la vida. Antes, no había razones para pensar que uno encontraría en la vejez algo interesante. Ahora está claro que se puede vivir mucho y vivir bien, por eso hablamos de longevidad positiva. 
----
+ * Hay controversias sobre si es válido hablar de edad subjetiva como algo diferente de la edad cronológica. lo que no se cuestiona es que efectivamente cada uno de nosotros sentimos la edad como un atributo personal, el sentirme más viejo o más jóven es algo que me ocurre a mí. Pero, lo que indican los datos es que pareciera que llega un momento en el que la edad deja de ser un dato relevante y se produce una discrepancia entre lo que sentimos sobre la edad y lo que marca nuestro Documento Nacional de Identidad DNI.
 * A medida que las personas envejecen, perciben que la vejez comienza más tarde.Hay controversias sobre este tema. Chronological Age and Subjective Perception of the Old-Age Threshold: An Empirical Verification of the Age-Group Dissociation Effect Using European Social Survey Data Published: 30 March 2022 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/s2079057022010052
 * Curiosamente los científicos ecuentran que es posible medir la diferencia entre la edad cronológica y la edad funcional, llamada también edad biológica y hablan del reloj epigénetico. La edad que tiene nuestro cuerpo. 
 * La pregunta sería ¿qué es lo que afecta nuestra percepción del tiempo en relación con nuestra propia vida?
 * Estamos frente las paradojas de la edad. Siendo jóvenes hay etapas en las que nos sentimos viejos. Curiosamente está demostrado que a medida que envejecemos nos sentimos más jóvenes. Al mismo tiempo, en un mundo de vidas de 100 años en cambio de ampliar nuestro horizonte vital lo achicamos.
 * Algunos estudios lo relacionan con el estrés, otros con la falta de perspectiva económica, otros plantean que las situaciones de crisis sociales influyen en nuestra percepción del futuro. Es como si se achicara el horizonte y nos quedaramos sin una perspectiva más lejana, se nos acorta la línea del curso de la vida. Pero, estas situaciones no son permanentes y la percepción de juventud o vejez tampoco.   
 
 * Lo importante es que no hay que preocuparse demasiado, estos cambios en la percepción de la edad son ciclos personales y sociales que varían naturalmente. Lo que sí conviene registrar es que no hay nada catastrófico en llegar a altas edades en la vida. Antes, no había razones para pensar que uno encontraría en la vejez algo interesante. Ahora está claro que se puede vivir mucho y vivir bien, por eso ya hablamos de longevidad positiva. 
 * Ver tambien: Diehl, M., Smyer, M. A., & Mehrotra, C. M. (2020). Optimizing aging: A call for a new narrative. American Psychologist, 75(4), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000598

----
Perception of when old age starts has increased over time, shows study
 * Nicola Davis Science correspondent for The Guardian Mon 22 Apr 2024 14.00 BST
 * As people get older, they revise the age they consider to be old upwards
 * https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/apr/22/when-old-age-starts-perception-study
“We should be aware that conceptions and perceptions of ‘old’ change across historical time, and that people are quite different regarding when they think old age begins, dependent on their age, their birth cohort, but also their health etc,” said Dr Markus Wettstein, co-author of the study, from the Humboldt University of Berlin.

Writing in the journal Psychology and Aging, Wettstein and colleagues report how they analysed responses to the question: “At what age would you describe someone as old?”, which is part of the ongoing German ageing survey that follows people born between 1911 and 1974.
As people get older, they perceive old age as starting later. Such phenomenon is explained by the so-called “age-group dissociation effect.” Since old people (as a part of society) and old age (as a stage of life) are the source of negative connotations, people tend to mentally distance from them in order to avoid stigma and to improve personal well-being. This study aims to investigate the impact of the attitude towards old people on the mental distance separating from the old-age threshold. Using data from European Social Survey (round 4), two measurement tools were developed: Ageism Index (AI) and Modified Mental Distance (MMD). The obtained results indicated no linear relationship between these two parameters. As so, no empirical evidence that supports the “age-group dissociation effect” hypothesis was found.

A medida que las personas envejecen, perciben que la vejez comienza más tarde. Este fenómeno se explica por el llamado “efecto de disociación de grupos de edad”. Dado que las personas mayores (como parte de la sociedad) y la vejez (como etapa de la vida) son fuente de connotaciones negativas, las personas tienden a distanciarse mentalmente de ellas para evitar el estigma y mejorar el bienestar personal. Este estudio tiene como objetivo investigar el impacto de la actitud hacia las personas mayores en la distancia mental que las separa del umbral de vejez. Utilizando datos de la Encuesta Social Europea (ronda 4), se desarrollaron dos herramientas de medición: el Índice de Edadismo (AI) y la Distancia Mental Modificada (MMD). Los resultados obtenidos no indicaron una relación lineal entre estos dos parámetros. Por lo tanto, no se encontró evidencia empírica que respalde la hipótesis del “efecto de disociación del grupo de edad”.
 * “This is a shame if it holds us back from living as full and happy lives as we could and should in our later years, because of us self-limiting our activities and aspirations,” she said.

Instead, Abrahams said the idea that we are “as old as we feel” is a lot more supportive.

“The truth is that chronological age is rarely a good proxy for anything and the sooner we realise that in our society, the better,” she said.

"Esto es una lástima si nos impide vivir una vida tan plena y feliz como podríamos y deberíamos en nuestros últimos años, debido a que autolimitamos nuestras actividades y aspiraciones", dijo.

En cambio, Abrahams dijo que la idea de que somos “tan viejos como nos sentimos” es mucho más solidaria.

"La verdad es que la edad cronológica rara vez es un buen indicador de algo y cuanto antes nos demos cuenta de eso en nuestra sociedad, mejor", dijo.
----
MANUALES Y GUÍAS PARA DETENER EL EDADISMO
 * El 
del Edadismo lanza la Guía para una Comunicación libre de Edadismo hacia las Personas Mayores en gallego y la presenta en la capital gallega junto a Afundación y la Cátedra del Edadismo de la Universidad de Vigo.
 * 30/05/2024
 * HelpAge International España ayuda a las personas mayores a reclamar sus derechos. Desde el año 2008, HelpAge International España ayuda a las personas mayores a reclamar sus derechos, enfrentarse a la discriminación y superar la pobreza para que puedan disfrutar de una vida digna, segura, activa y saludable.

 * Somos parte de la red global de HelpAge International, formada por 177 organizaciones de 93 países. Llevamos a cabo múltiples iniciativas de incidencia política, formación y sensibilización para construir una sociedad amigable y sensible a todos los niveles con la realidad de las personas mayores y sus derechos.
----
 * VÂNIA DE LA FUENTE-NÚÑEZ: “EL EDADISMO SE DEBE VER COMO UN PROBLEMA DE SALUD PÚBLICA”

 * 31 de agosto de 2023
 * https://www.segg.es/actualidad-segg/2023/08/31/vania-de-la-fuente-nu%C3%B1ez-el-edadismo-se-debe-ver-como-un-problema-de-salud-publica
 * VÂNIA DE LA FUENTE-NÚÑEZ: “EL EDADISMO SE DEBE VER COMO UN PROBLEMA DE SALUD PÚBLICA”
 * LA TRAMPA DE LA EDAD
 * SEGUIR EXPLORANDO
----
COMO ES EL NUEVO RELOJ EPIGENÉTICO
 * Cómo es el nuevo reloj epigenético desarrollado por expertos de Harvard que podría predecir el envejecimiento celular
Se trata de un modelo de aprendizaje automático capaz de medir la edad biológica de las células, más allá de la cronológica. Cómo este avance podría impulsar la longevidad
02 Mar, 2024
 * https://www.infobae.com/tendencias/2024/03/02/como-es-el-nuevo-reloj-epigenetico-desarrollado-por-expertos-de-harvard-que-podria-predecir-el-envejecimiento-celular/

----Harvard researchers create model that better measures biological age, distinguishes between harmful and adaptive changes during life
New “clocks” may provide answers to the question: What causes us to age?
 * https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2024/02/looking-to-rewind-the-aging-clock/

Researchers at Harvard-affiliated Brigham and Women’s Hospital have developed a novel epigenetic clock, a machine-learning model designed to predict biological age from DNA structure. The clock can distinguish between genetic differences that slow and accelerate aging, predict biological age, and evaluate anti-aging interventions with increased accuracy. The results are published in Nature Aging. 

“Previous clocks considered the relationship between methylation patterns and features we know are correlated with aging, but they don’t tell us which factors cause one’s body to age faster or slower,” said corresponding author said corresponding author Vadim Gladyshev, a principal investigator in the Division of Genetics at BWH. “Our clocks distinguish between changes that accelerate and counteract aging to predict biological age and assess the efficacy of aging interventions.”
 * 
----
 * ¿A qué edad somos oficialmente viejos?
 * https://www.aarp.org/espanol/hogar-familia/familia-bienestar/info-2017/a-que-edad-se-es-viejo.html
4 generaciones expresan su opinión.
Por Shelley Emling,   AARP
----
 * ¿por qué se dice que viejos son los otros?
----
 * Living to 120 and Beyond: Americans’ Views on Aging, Medical Advances and Radical Life Extension
 * https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2013/08/06/living-to-120-and-beyond-americans-views-on-aging-medical-advances-and-radical-life-extension/
----
 * Pew Research Center + AGE AND PERCEPTION OF AGEING
----
 * Optimizing aging: A call for a new narrative.
 * Citation
  Diehl, M., Smyer, M. A., & Mehrotra, C. M. (2020). Optimizing aging: A call for a new narrative. American Psychologist, 75(4), 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000598
 * Abstract
 * Decades of research have shown that biological and psychosocial aging are not as predetermined as had been thought for a long time. Yet, despite a large and growing evidence base, most individuals still hold negative views of aging that keep them from optimizing their chances for healthy and productive aging. Given this general background, this article has three major objectives: (a) to show that the 3 big misconceptions at the heart of the public’s negative views of aging can be refuted based on scientific evidence; (b) to illustrate that changing individuals’ views of aging calls for the development of a new narrative on aging, one that incorporates the increasing diversity of the aging population; and (c) to discuss how psychologists can contribute to creating this new narrative on aging. We argue that growing old(er) in the United States is not the same old business anymore and that psychologists are uniquely positioned to contribute to the social and cultural transformation that population aging and increasing diversity in the U.S. society require. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)


Published 29 de junio de 2017
----
 * LOS FRANCESES Y EL EDADISMO
 * VER INVESTIGACIÓN AQUÍ
 * https://www.hcfea.fr/IMG/pdf/enquete_sur_l_agisme_hcfea-harris_-_vf.pdf
----
 * PERSPECTIVA DE LA EDAD
 * SEGUIR EXPLORANDO
 * Pew Research Center + SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION ON AGE AND FUNCIONAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGE


----
 * ABRIL, 2024
 * Perception of when old age starts has increased over time, shows study

 * As people get older, they revise the age they consider to be old upwards
 * Perception of when old age starts has increased over time, shows study

 * As people get older, they revise the age they consider to be old upwards

 * Nicola Davis Science correspondent
 * Mon 22 Apr 2024
 * https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/apr/22/when-old-age-starts-perception-study
 * 
----
 * La gallega que lidera el proyecto mundial de edadismo en la OMS: «Deberíamos desterrar la palabra anciano»
 * Lois Balado Tomé
 * La coruñesa Vânia de la Fuente-Núñez lucha contra el «racismo de la edad» desde Ginebra, poniendo los cimientos a un problema que el organismo considera de salud pública
 * 23 feb 2022
 * https://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/lavozdelasalud/enfermedades/2022/02/21/gallega-lidera-proyecto-mundial-edadismo-oms-deberiamos-desterrar-palabra-anciano/00031645456754534726751.htm
 * Lograr la nota de corte necesaria para acceder a la carrera de medicina supone, para la mayoría y con todo por delante, la meta. Un pequeño paso para el estudiante y un gran paso para una vida cómoda. Por mucho que quede por recorrer, el camino ya está despejado. Universidad-MIR-residencia, el tríptico que suele servir de preámbulo a un futuro, con sus sinsabores, holgado. Vânia de la Fuente-Núñez (A Coruña, 1988), eligió el camino escarpado. Había entrado en medicina, pero entre tanta clínica, entre tanta anatomía, extrañaba un enfoque más social. No quiso hacer el MIR. Imagínense qué disgusto para los defensores del camino asfaltado verla discurrir por el vial de los «patitos feos». De la facultad de Santiago, saltó a Barcelona. Investigó. Se fue a Gambia y a Senegal antes de hacer un máster en Filosofía, Política y Economía de la Medicina en Londres. Hasta que la OMS la reclutó buscando manos en plena epidemia de ébola en el año 2014. Se quedó en Ginebra, donde hoy esta coruñesa es la responsable técnico en la Unidad de Cambio Demográfico y Envejecimiento Saludable de la OMS y directora de la Campaña Mundial contra el Edadismo. Porque el edadismo preocupa en la gran institución mundial de la salud. 

-¿Qué es el edadismo?

-Cuando hablamos de edadismo, hablamos de tres dimensiones diferentes: nos referimos a nuestra forma de pensar con respecto a la edad, que son los estereotipos; a nuestra forma de sentir, que son nuestros prejuicios; y a nuestra forma de actuar, que es la discriminación. Hacia otras personas, pero también hacia nosotros mismos en función de la edad. La palabra edadismo se ha empezado a utilizar con más frecuencia en los últimos cinco años. En español, veo que cuando la gente habla de edadismo lo equipara discriminación por edad, y no es lo mismo. El edadismo es discriminación, pero también estereotipos y prejuicios. 

-¿Y por qué la OMS se dedica a estudiar el edadismo? Parece más una disciplina sociológica que algo en lo que trabaje una institución que asociamos a, por ejemplo, la gestión de una pandemia...

-Cuando hago una presentación pública y empiezo a ver las caras de la gente, es una de las preguntas que intento responder pronto. Todo empezó en el año 2016. La OMS es una organización guiada por sus estados miembro, que son 194. Estos se reúnen todos los años y ayudan a identificar áreas en las que se tiene que actuar en relación a la salud. En el 2016 pidieron al director general que se desarrollara la campaña mundial contra el edadismo, que es la que yo dirijo. ¿Por qué? Porque fue un año en el que se adaptó la primera estrategia y plan de acción mundial sobre el envejecimiento y la salud. Marcó un punto de inflexión. Los países se empezaron a dar cuenta de que realmente iba a ser difícil avanzar en ningún programa o política hacia las personas mayores si no se acababa antes con el edadismo. Y tiene toda la lógica del mundo. Si yo estoy formulando políticas en mi país y parto de unas ideas erróneas acerca de las personas mayores y sus necesidades, no me voy a hacer las preguntas adecuadas. Y desde luego no llegaré a las respuestas correctas. Había mucho trabajo por hacer antes de avanzar hacia cualquier otra cosa en relación al envejecimiento o la salud. Por eso pidieron que se desarrollara esta campaña. Nos hemos dedicado a recopilar toda la evidencia, porque hasta ahora había un estudio por aquí y otro por allá, pero no sé sabía muy bien qué funcionaba para eliminarlo y sin esa base es muy difícil dar apoyo para que haya cambios. Fueron los países los que se dieron cuenta y los que empujaron para que se actuase. 

-Pero, ¿por qué se considera un problema de salud pública?

-Porque, como mostramos en el informe mundial sobre el edadismo, tiene un impacto muy negativo en nuestra salud y bienestar cuando somos mayores. El edadismo está asociado con una muerte muy temprana y se ha demostrado en países como China o Alemania, bastante diferentes entre sí. Un estudio realizado en China encontró que las personas mayores con actitudes negativas hacia el envejecimiento tenían casi un 20 % de probabilidades más de morir durante el período del estudio, que era de seis años, que aquellas con autopercepciones más positivas.

-Traducido sería que a la gente que no le gusta envejecer tiene más probabilidades de morir antes, ¿pero por qué mueren esas personas?

-Se ha encontrado esa asociación. Pueden morir por diferentes causas y hay más efectos para la salud y el bienestar que la asociación con una muerte temprana. Se ha visto que el edadismo está asociado con hábitos de salud dañinos, como no tomarse la medicación prescrita, beber o fumar. Si se interioriza el estereotipo de que la vejez es un tiempo de enfermedad, puedo pensar: «¿Para qué me voy a estar tomando estos tratamientos si, total, este momento de mi vida es, supuestamente, de enfermedad. No sirve de nada que me tome un tratamiento». Este tipo de razonamientos derivan en conductas perjudiciales para la salud y esto, a su vez, puede desencadenar en la muerte. Pero tiene muchas más repercusiones. Se sabe que afecta a nuestra salud mental, incluida la aparición de depresión. También en el número de hospitalizaciones, enfermedades crónicas... Hay un montón de estudios en este campo que han constatado esto. La mayor parte se centran en los efectos del edadismo en la vejez, pero todavía no sabemos los impactos que tiene cuando somos más jóvenes. 
----
DISCRIMINACIÓN EN EL ESPACIO CULTURAL
 * https://www.helpage.es/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Informe-HelpAge-2022_-La-discriminacion-de-las-personas-mayores-en-el-ambito-laboral.pdf

DIVERSIDAD GENERACIONAL
Actualmente encontramos que en una misma empresa conviven hasta cuatro generaciones en el trabajo. Desde los más cercanos a la jubilación hasta los que recién se incorporan al mundo laboral, tenemos: los Baby boomers, generación X, millennials y centennials.20 mar 2023
----
 * Optimizing aging: A call for a new narrative
 * https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32378951/
 * Diehl M, Smyer MA, Mehrotra CM. Optimizing aging: A call for a new narrative. Am Psychol. 2020 May-Jun;75(4):577-589. doi: 10.1037/amp0000598. PMID: 32378951; PMCID: PMC7213015.
 * Abstract
 * Decades of research have shown that biological and psychosocial aging are not as predetermined as had been thought for a long time. Yet, despite a large and growing evidence base, most individuals still hold negative views of aging that keep them from optimizing their chances for healthy and productive aging. Given this general background, this article has three major objectives: (1) To show that the three big misconceptions at the heart of the public’s negative views of aging can be refuted based on scientific evidence. (2) To illustrate that changing individuals’ views of aging calls for the development of a new narrative on aging—one that incorporates the increasing diversity of the aging population. (3) To discuss how psychologists can contribute to creating this new narrative on aging. We argue that growing old(er) in the U.S. is not the same old business anymore and that psychologists are uniquely positioned to contribute to the social and cultural transformation that population aging and increasing diversity in the U.S. society require.

Keywords: misconceptions about aging, views of aging, human capital, narrative on aging, diversity
 * Popular slogans like “60 is the new 40” suggest that compared to previous generations, current cohorts of middle-aged and older adults may feel younger and may approach their own aging with more positive attitudes and expectations. Although this conclusion seems logical, the general public’s actual views of aging as a process and of older adults as a social group, however, are still mostly negative and pessimistic (Lindland, Fond, Haydon, & Kendall-Taylor, 2015). These negative views persist despite the fact that decades of biomedical and psychological research on human aging have shown that there are very strong reasons for more positive views of aging—both at the individual and the societal level (Levy, 2017). Given this general background, this article has three major objectives: (1) To show that scientific evidence refutes the three big misconceptions at the heart of the public’s negative views of aging. (2) To illustrate that changing individuals’ views of aging calls for the development of a new narrative on aging—one that incorporates the increasing diversity of the aging population. (3) To discuss how psychologists can contribute to creating the new narrative on aging. Along with other authors (e.g., Carstensen, 2011; James, Matz-Costa, & Smyer, 2016), we argue that growing old(er) in the 21st century is not the same old business anymore and that psychologists are uniquely positioned to contribute to the social and cultural transformation that population aging and increasing diversity in the U.S. society require.

Adult Development and Aging: An Increasingly “Open Enterprise”
A number of advances have benefitted cohorts of middle-aged and older adults since the 1950s. For example, the average life expectancy in the U.S. has steadily risen over the past century and never before in human history have adults had so many years of life (Crimmins, 2015). Moreover, advances in the treatment of age-related chronic diseases have resulted in a great extension of years of disability-free life expectancy (Crimmins, Zhang, & Saito, 2016), referred to as “longevity dividend” (Olshansky, Perry, Miller, & Butler, 2006). This dividend, along with other changes like better education (Census Bureau, 2015), more flexible age norms related to family formation, work and retirement (James et al., 2016), greater financial security, and greater opportunities for older adults to be involved in their communities (Anderson, et al., 2014), should be reasons for a more positive view of aging, especially for young-old adults (age 60–75) who are considered to be in their third age (Baltes & Smith, 2003).

Yet, a report titled “Gauging Aging: Mapping Gaps between Expert and Public Understandings of Aging in America” (Lindland et al., 2015) found a wide gap between the public’s views of aging, and what social science experts know based on decades of research findings. In particular, three major misconceptions about aging are at the heart of the public’s negative views of aging: (1) For most adults, growing old(er) involves primarily loss and decline; (2) changes that happen with aging are beyond a person’s control; and (3) age-related losses are permanent and irreversible. These three misconceptions are often complemented by a fourth one about older adults as a social group, namely: Older adults are a burden on society.

Addressing these misconceptions and debunking the underlying narrative will help the public understand that aging in the U.S. in the 21st century is not the same old business anymore and that growing older has become a more open experience with unique challenges but also unique opportunities and responsibilities. Refuting these misconceptions is important because they do a great deal of harm to individuals and to the larger society (Levy, 2009, 2017).

Debunking Three Common Misconceptions About Aging
Before we debunk the three big misconceptions that underlie adults’ negative views of aging, it is important that we acknowledge certain realities that are part of aging in the U.S. That is, it is essential to understand that older adults are the most heterogeneous age group with regard to physical, psychological, and social functioning. This heterogeneity implies that there is a certain percentage of individuals for whom aging brings some real and serious challenges that affect their lives in profound ways, especially during the Fourth Age (age 80 and older) when cognitive and health-related losses often threaten individuals’ quality of life (Baltes & Smith, 2003). In terms of physical health, for example, all chronic diseases are age-related: six in ten adults in the U.S. have one chronic disease; and four in ten U.S. adults have two or more chronic conditions (National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2019). Similarly, large performance differences in older adults’ cognitive functioning exist among individuals of the same age, ranging from being impaired to very high functioning and affecting how these individuals change over time, and when they fall below a functional threshold (Hertzog, Kramer, Wilson, & Lindenberger, 2009; Schaie, 2013). These large between-person differences also exist in life satisfaction and well-being (Gerstorf et al., 2010), control beliefs (Infurna & Okun, 2015; Robinson & Lachman, 2017), and social connectedness (Cornwell, Laumann, & Schumm, 2008) and often persist into very late life (Gerstorf et al., 2010). In brief, by advocating for a more positive view of aging, we are not ignoring that (a) adult development and aging, in general, is characterized by large interindividual differences, or (b) that growing older can be associated with major physical, psychological, and social challenges for a certain percentage of middle-aged and older adults. Moreover, we are also not ignoring that the increase in active life expectancy has primarily benefited the young-old (third age), whereas increased vulnerability and the threats inherent in terminal decline (Baltes & Smith, 2003) often challenge the quality of life of old-old adults (fourth age). Thus, it is important to keep these qualifications in mind for the remainder of this article.

Aging is not all loss and decline.
Several areas of psychological research provide evidence that aging, especially during the third age, is not all loss and decline. Specifically, evidence related to intellectual and personality development, emotion experience and regulation, and from the area of mental health disorders and life satisfaction shows that there are many positive changes and improvements that happen as individuals age. In the area of intellectual aging, for example, extensive data from the Seattle Longitudinal Study (SLS; Schaie, 2013) have shown that for most primary mental abilities reliable age-related decline commonly does not occur before the age of 60, and marked decline does not occur until individuals reach their 80s. Exceptions to this rule are numerical ability and processing speed for which reliable decline starts in the mid-50s (Schaie, 2013). Thus, based on this extensive longitudinal data set, the notion that intellectual decline starts for most adults in their early- to mid-30s can be refuted.

Findings in the area of personality development mirror the good news from intelligence research. Based on a meta-analysis of 92 longitudinal studies, Roberts and Mroczek (2008) showed that there were significant and meaningful mean-level improvements in the Big Five traits of agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability (the inverse of neuroticism) from age 20 to about age 70. The other two traits, extraversion and openness to experience, remained mostly stable over the course of adulthood with declines not happening before the age of 60. Thus, these findings suggest that over the course of adulthood and into old age, most individuals’ personality changes in positive and adaptive ways, potentially influencing positive changes in other areas of functioning. Nevertheless, evidence also suggests that adults’ adaptive personality characteristics may be challenged very late in life when cognitive and health-related losses are more likely to occur (Diehl, Chui, Hay, Lumley, Grühn, & Labouvie-Vief, 2014).

Third, there are also positive age-related changes in emotion experience and emotion regulation (Carstensen et al., 2011; Charles & Carstensen, 2014). Using a combined experience sampling and longitudinal design, Carstensen et al. (2011) showed that over a 10-year period, aging was associated with more positive overall emotional well-being, greater emotional stability, and greater emotional complexity. These findings held after accounting for the effects of competing variables, such as physical health, personality, and demographic factors. Moreover, emotional experience also predicted mortality: individuals who experienced relatively more positive than negative emotions in daily life were more likely to be alive 13 years later. Other independent data are consistent with these findings (Hay & Diehl, 2011). In summary, considerable evidence suggests that emotion experience and regulation improve for a majority of individuals as they age (Charles & Carstensen, 2014).

Finally, a large body of research shows that older adults report higher levels of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, and positive over negative affect compared to younger adults, and life satisfaction and subjective well-being tend to improve with age (Charles, Reynolds, & Gatz, 2001; Mroczek & Kolarz, 1998). These findings complement research showing that the prevalence rates of all major psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression, anxiety disorders, etc.) are significantly lower in individuals age 60 and older compared to younger individuals (Kessler, Berglund, Demler, Jin, Merakangas, & Walters, 2005).

In summary, although age is a risk factor for a number of health-related and social losses, findings in the areas of intellectual and personality development, emotional development, subjective well-being and mental health provide evidence that aging, at least until very late life (the fourth age), is not all downhill. Rather, a number of important age-related improvements occur. This evidence debunks the misconception that aging is all loss and decline.

Adults have more control over their aging than they believe.
The second major misconception about adult development and aging is that age-related changes are beyond a person’s control. This misconception is dangerous because it leads many middle-aged and older adults to the conclusion that there is nothing they can do to age in a more positive way. Yet a growing body of evidence indicates that lifestyle factors and behavior account for more variance in health-related and psychological outcomes than genetics. Although genetics are important for longevity (Martin, Bergman, & Barzilai, 2007), research also shows that the influence of genetics on psychological aging is often overestimated by the general public. For example, a meta-analysis by Tucker-Drob and Briley (2014) showed for identical twins that genetics accounted for only 30% of the variance in age-related memory changes. This means that non-genetic influences accountef for 70% of the variance, including the effects of environment and lifestyle. Findings like these are consistent with research documenting a great, but not unlimited, amount of behavioral plasticity, including neuroplasticity, as individuals age (Hertzog et al., 2009; Lindenberger, 2014).

Evidence suggesting that individuals have more control over their aging than they believe comes from a growing body of biomedical and psychological research showing great physiological, cognitive, and behavioral plasticity (Hertzog et al., 2009; Lindenberger, 2014). In this context, plasticity is defined as a person’s capacity to develop qualitatively new forms of behavior and performance (i.e., behavioral plasticity) or the long-lasting alteration of physiological processes or neural structures in the human body (i.e., neuroplasticity; Lövdén, Bäckman, Lindenberger, Schaefer, & Schmiedek, 2010). To illustrate, several systematic literature reviews report that half of the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease is explained by seven lifestyle-related factors, which are: hypertension, diabetes, obesity, smoking, depression, cognitive inactivity/low education, and physical inactivity (Barnett, Hachinski, & Blackwell, 2013; Baumgart, Snyder, Carillo, Fazio, Kim, & Johns, 2015). Although not all of these factors (e.g., depression) may be under a person’s control, most of them are and they can slow down cognitive decline or delay the onset of dementia. Thus, becoming physically active, eating a healthy diet (e.g., Mediterranean diet), maintaining normal body weight, abstaining from smoking, and engaging in cognitively stimulating activities are under individuals’ control and are critical for optimizing their chances for healthy physical and cognitive aging (Hertzog et al., 2009).

In particular, engaging in regular physical activity (i.e., 30 minutes of moderate physical activity on 5 days per week) has well-documented health benefits. These benefits include better cardiovascular, respiratory, and musculoskeletal health (DiPietro, 2001), improved resistance to Type 2 diabetes (Sigal, Kenny, Wasserman, Castaneda-Sceppa, & White, 2006) and cancers (Holmes, Chen, Feskanich, Kroenke, & Colditz, 2005), improved affect and cognitive function (Kramer & Erickson, 2007), and lower risk for depression (DiPietro, 2001). These beneficial effects of physical activity on a wide range of health outcomes led Lachman, Lipsitz, Lubben, Castaneda-Sceppa, and Jette (2018) to the conclusion that “Physical activity is arguably the most promising non-pharmacological, noninvasive, and cost-effective method of health promotion, that is, to the extent that people do it” (p. 2).

Evidence for the malleability of age-related changes comes also from cognitive training and intervention research (Willis & Belleville, 2016). Findings from the Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly (ACTIVE) trial, for example, showed that cognitive training in speed of processing, inductive reasoning, and episodic memory resulted in significant improvements in older adults’ cognitive functioning (Ball et al., 2002). Although the observed gains were limited to the trained domain, they were mostly maintained at the 5-year follow-up (Willis et al., 2006) and to a lesser extent at the 10-year follow up (Rebok et al., 2014). At the 10-year follow-up, participants in the intervention groups also reported greater independence in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) compared to participants in the control group (Rebok et al., 2014). Thus, findings from the ACTIVE trial suggest that cognitive training can improve long-term cognitive functioning and maintenance of independence in IADLs among adults with normal cognition.

Because cognitive training studies have usually produced very narrow, ability-specific training effects (Lindenberger, 2014), researchers have started to ask whether other forms of engagement might be more effective in maintaining adults’ cognitive abilities. Studies examining the effects of complex cognitive or social engagement (Carlson et al., 2009; Park et al., 2014; Stine-Morrow, Parisi, Morrow, & Park, 2008) or engagement in physical activity (Erickson et al., 2011) have tried to answer this question. In terms of complex cognitive engagement, Stine-Morrow et al. (2008) showed that participants in an engaged lifestyle group showed positive change in a composite measure of fluid ability over a six-month observation period compared to individuals in a social contact group. Similar results were reported by Park et al. (2014) with regard to the effects of a cognitively demanding intervention (e.g., learning how to quilt, learning digital photography) on participants’ episodic memory. Thus, findings from both of these studies suggest that sustained engagement in cognitively demanding and novel activities enhances memory and fluid cognitive abilities in older adults.

Although a meta-analysis by Colcombe and Kramer (2003) already provided evidence of the positive effects of engagement in physical activity on several cognitive functions, the study by Erickson et al. (2011) was the first one to document significant associations of physical exercise with markers of neuroplasticity (Lindenberger, 2014). Specifically, this study showed that regular engagement in aerobic exercise over a 12-months period increased the level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein involved in neurogenesis and neuroplasticity, and the hippocampal volume in previously sedentary older adults. Participants in the aerobic exercise condition also showed significant improvements on several memory tests. Importantly, these effects were only observed in participants who engaged in aerobic exercise and not in participants who did stretching and toning exercises for the same amount of time. This suggests that neuroplasticity in the hippocampus was specifically due to the effects of aerobic exercise. Replications of these findings have been reported by several other research groups (see the review by Stillman, Cohen, Lehman, & Erickson, 2016).

In summary, the reviewed research findings refute the misconception that age-related changes are beyond a person’s control. Although individuals may not have complete control over their aging process (e.g., susceptibility to develop a chronic disease due to hereditary factors), findings from psychological research indicate that age-related changes are also not completely pre-programmed and can be influenced through behavior and lifestyle. This is another reason why aging is not the same old business anymore because middle-aged and older adults have the opportunity and the personal responsibility to take control of their own aging—unless their misconceptions about aging are holding them back (Levy & Myers, 2004).

Age-related losses may be reversible.
Aside from the evidence showing a considerable amount of physiological and behavioral plasticity across the adult lifespan, there is also evidence indicating that not all age-related losses are permanent and irreversible. Indeed, growing evidence suggests that many age-related losses should be perceived as potentially modifiable factors. Using data from the Seattle Longitudinal Study, Schaie and Willis (1986) showed that reliable cognitive decline that had occurred in participants over a 14-year period in the abilities of inductive reasoning and spatial orientation (i.e., fluid abilities) could be reversed by taking part in a 5-hour training program. Specifically, the results showed that the cognitive training reversed the reliably documented decline in inductive reasoning and spatial orientation in 62% of the participants, and also improved the performance in participants who had remained stable. Also, training improvements were greater for women than for men. These findings are remarkable because they suggest that engaging in cognitively stimulating activities, as long as they are sufficiently novel and complex (Park et al., 2014; Stine-Morrow et al. 2008), may be an effective way of reversing age-related decline or, at a minimum, an effective way of maintaining the current level of cognitive functioning.

Evidence that age-related losses can be minimized, delayed, or reversed come from two other areas of aging research. The first area is research on osteoporosis (i.e., age-related loss of bone mineral density) and sarcopenia (i.e., age-related decrease in skeletal muscle mass, function, and strength; Hong & Kim, 2018). The second area is research on the transient and dynamic nature of age-related disabilities (Gill, Murphy, Barry, & Allore, 2009).

Loss of muscle mass and loss of bone density are age-related, and a combination of age-related physiological changes, inactivity, and inadequate nutrition cause a gradual loss of bone mass, at a rate of 1% per year after the age of 40, and loss of muscle mass at a rate of 3–5% per decade after age 30. This means that both women and men need to be concerned about osteoporosis and sarcopenia because these conditions are progressive if untreated and may jeopardize a person’s mobility and increase the risk of falls and fractures. Fortunately, since the mid-90s, aging researchers have systematically examined the effects of resistance training on bone and muscle health and several meta-analyses have shown that resistance exercise at about 70% of a person’s maximum load can slow down the process of sarcopenia and osteoporosis and can even reverse these processes (Hong & Kim, 2018). Although the specific mechanisms and dose-response relationships creating these effects are not yet completely understood, the findings have been very consistent and are of particular importance for post-menopausal women, who are at an elevated risk of developing osteoporosis.

Disability is another area with a growing evidence base regarding the possible reversibility of negative age-related changes. Although disability rates in later adulthood have been declining for several decades (Crimmins et al., 2016), there are still a certain percentage of individuals who are at risk of becoming frail and disabled during old age. A major question with regard to this subpopulation is: What are the pathways into long-term disability and are there individuals who recover from a state of disability? Hardy and Gill (2004) addressed this question in a prospective cohort study of 754 initially non-disabled, community-dwelling persons aged 70 years or older. Individuals were assessed on a monthly basis for over 4 years in terms of their ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). During this observation period, a total of 420 participants (56%) experienced disability and of these participants, 399 (81%) regained independence within 12 months of their initial disability episode. A majority (57%) of these adults maintained independence for at least 6 months. Subsequent findings from this prospective study showed that distinct subtypes of disability can be identified (Gill, Guo, & Allore, 2008) and that there are a number of moderating factors (e.g., depressive symptoms) determining whether individuals are likely to fall into the transient or short-term subgroup or into the long-term subgroup. Moreover, a study by Levy, Slade, Murphy, and Gill (2012) showed that older adults with positive views of aging were 44% more likely to fully recover from severe disability compared to older adults with negative views of aging. This finding suggests that individuals’ views of aging may play an important role in whether an age-related loss can be reversed or not.

In summary, the big three misconceptions that underlie the general public’s negative views of aging can be debunked based on evidence from decades of scientific research. More importantly, knowing that positive aging can be achieved through individuals’ own choices and actions calls for a change of the overall narrative on aging, switching from a narrative focused on loss and decline to a narrative focused on opportunities and challenges.

Changing the Narrative on Aging
Changing the current narrative on aging with its focus on loss and decline is not an easy task because societal and personal views of aging are extremely entrenched. In terms of personal views of aging, Levy (2009) elaborated in her Stereotype Embodiment Theory that individuals internalize negative age stereotypes from the surrounding culture from an early age. These negative age stereotypes become increasingly self-relevant in midlife and later adulthood and become dangerous because they undermine individuals’ behavior in the form of negative self-stereotypes. Specifically, holding negative age stereotypes has been shown to be associated with poorer cognitive and physical functioning (Hess, Hinson, & Statham, 2004; Sargent-Cox, Anstey, & Luszcz, 2012), greater morbidity (Kotter-Grühn, Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn, & Gerstorf, 2009), less engagement in preventive health behaviors (Levy & Myers, 2004), slower recovery from disability (Levy et al., 2012), and an increased risk of dying earlier (Levy, Slade, Kunkel, & Kasl, 2002). Thus, a person’s negative views of aging are a major risk factor affecting his/her physical and mental health via the process of negative self-stereotyping and by becoming a negative self-fulfilling prophecy (Levy, 2009).

At the societal level, still rampant negative age stereotypes and negative views of aging are the cause for prejudice and discrimination against older adults (Nelson, 2016). Recently, Levy (2017) coined the term Age-Stereotype Paradox to refer to the fact that age stereotypes have actually become more negative in the U.S. in recent decades despite all the evidence showing that more positive views of aging are warranted. The main reason why this is important is that the continued existence of negative age stereotypes at the personal and societal level represents probably the biggest barrier toward developing a more positive narrative on aging. Thus, the question becomes: How can a new narrative on aging, consistent with the previously presented research findings, be developed and promoted to benefit of individuals and the larger society?

Promoting a New Narrative on Aging
The Reframing Aging initiative.
Consistent with the scientific evidence that helped to debunk the three major misconceptions held by the general public, several organizations in the U.S. have recognized that ageism continues to be a highly prevalent form of institutionalized prejudice domestically and around the world (Officer & de la Fuente-Núñez, 2018). Collectively, these organizations have initiated the Reframing Aging initiative (www.reframingaging.org) to fight ageism and implicit bias against older adults by reframing the current narrative on aging. The initiative builds on the “Gauging Aging” report (Lindland et al., 2015) and represents a long-term social change initiative with the goal of improving the public’s understanding about what aging really looks like based on research findings. Specifically, the ‘Reframing Aging’ initiative provides a number of evidence-informed tools that professionals, who work with organizations serving older adults or with older adults directly, can use to engage in informed and positive conversations about aging as a process and about older adults as a social group. Because this is a recent initiative, there are no data on the program’s efficacy and/or long-term effects. However, findings of a recent study by Busso, Volmert, and Kendall-Taylor (2019) give reason for optimism. Specifically, this controlled experiment showed that positive reframing of age-related messages reduced study participants’ negative implicit bias against older adults.

Changing the messaging in public debates and the media.
Although the Reframing Aging initiative is a promising step in the right direction, there are a number of other important avenues for changing the societal narrative on aging. Because the media and public debates often portray older adults as a burden on society and as drainers of scarce resources (Löckenhoff et al, 2009), it is crucial that media and public messaging counteract the widespread stereotype of the “greedy geezers” (Lieberman, 2013). Evidence that disproves this negative stereotype comes from at least three areas: work, caregiving, and volunteering.

In terms of work, it is well-documented that older workers are as productive and capable of using technology as younger workers (DeNisco, 2016), and more agreeable to be part of an intergenerational workforce (Hedge, Borman, & Lammlein, 2006). Despite this evidence and despite existing laws against age discrimination in the workplace, discrimination against older adults is still very common in hiring, promotion, and retention (Perron, 2018). In terms of caregiving, about 9 million adults over the age of 65 serve as caregivers to an adult or child with functional impairment (National Alliance for Caregiving & AARP, 2015), and custodial grandparents care for about 3 million children in the U.S. (Pew Research Center, 2013). Most of these caregiving activities are unpaid and the total economic value of caregiving is estimated at several hundred billion dollars annually. In terms of volunteering, the Corporation for National and Community Service (2016) reported that in 2016 about 25% of older adults volunteered in their communities, providing about 3.3 billion hours of service and producing economic value estimated at $77 billion. Taken together, all of these data indicate that older adults are not a burden on society, but contribute in very productive and meaningful ways (Gonzales, Matz-Costa, Morrow-Howell, 2015).

In conclusion, data on the contributions of older adults in the areas of work, caregiving, and volunteering clearly show that older adults represent an important source of human capital in the U.S. The new narrative on aging needs to incorporate this fact, with the goal of refuting the common misconception that older adults are a major drain on societal resources (Lieberman, 2013). Media should avoid terms such as “silver tsunami” (Canadian Broadcasting Company, 2017) because this term implies that population aging represents a threat to society comparable to a natural disaster. Instead, older adults should be seen as a valuable “natural resource” (Corporation for National and Community Service, 2016).

Workplace-based health and wellness programs.
Another important avenue for promoting the new narrative on aging are workplace-based health and wellness programs (HWPs). Employers, human resource managers, and employees give these programs very favorable endorsements. Moreover, such programs can reach middle-aged and older adults in an environment where they spend time daily (Pitt-Catsouphes, James, & Matz-Costa, 2015).1 Thus, we suggest that HWPs may be an ideal setting for disseminating information relevant to healthy and successful aging, and for motivating adults to take personal responsibility for their own aging. Integrating information on misconceptions of aging and how to optimize positive aging into HWPs points to an untapped opportunity to change individuals’ implicit narrative on aging and to contribute to a workforce that is better educated about the aging process in general. Such an educated workforce may also approach the transition into retirement in a more proactive way and may continue to stay productively engaged in retirement (James et al., 2016). Moreover, workplace-based HWPs may be an ideal setting for creating situations to illustrate to individuals that the common negative age-related stereotypes may not be congruent with their own personal experiences. Creating such situations is critically important for generating attitude change because studies have shown that the debilitating effects of negative age stereotypes can be mitigated or completely eliminated if individuals perceive a mismatch between the stereotypes and how they view themselves (Levy & Leifheit-Limson, 2009). In summary, workplace-based HWPs may be another promising avenue to promote a more positive narrative on aging—for the benefit of individuals and society.

Focusing on middle-aged adults.
Lastly, we also suggest that efforts to change the narrative on aging focus more on educating middle-aged adults (age 40–64) about the process of aging. That is, middle-aged adults should become an important target group for efforts to counteract the common misconceptions of aging, getting equipped with knowledge and behavioral tools to approach aging with a positive attitude. Importantly, middle-aged adults are most susceptible to engaging in negative age self-stereotyping (Levy, 2009) because they are at a life stage when they become aware of age-related changes (Diehl & Wahl, 2010). This increased awareness might be due to subjective experiences (e.g., perceived changes in physical appearance) or due to cues from the social environment, and may create a sense of psychological uncertainty that may become the reason for negative self-stereotyping. That is, middle-aged adults are at high risk of turning negative age stereotypes against their own person—a process that happens unconsciously most of the time (Levy, 2009). In contrast, older adults often can confirm or disconfirm the veracity of negative age stereotypes based on their own experiences and may therefore be less vulnerable (Nelson, 2016).

Another reason for focusing on middle-aged adults is that they are often still in good health and not affected yet by serious chronic illnesses and/or comorbidities, and have many years of life ahead of them. Thus, middle-aged adults are the perfect audience to take advantage of opportunities to learn about optimal and healthy aging. Indeed, individuals in this age group have the most to gain from not buying into the common misconceptions on aging if they want to stay healthy and productive as they grow older (Crimmins, 2015), and they represent the birth cohorts that will grow older in a U.S. society that is becoming increasingly diverse.

Diversity and Inclusion: Challenges and Opportunities
The discussion about forging a new societal narrative on aging would be incomplete without recognizing that this endeavor also needs to take into account another major societal transformation: the increasing diversity of the U.S. society and the shift to a majority-minority nation (Torres-Gil & Angel, 2018). Although the topic of diversity is often truncated to the factor of race and ethnicity, other elements of diversity deserve equal attention. Specifically, differences in socio-economic status/social class, immigration status and cultural background, gender and gender identity, sexual orientation, rural-urban location, and religious affiliations are major features of diversity. More importantly, these features are not independent of each other, but are interrelated and often create complex individual or group identities (Mehrotra & Wagner, 2019).

Diversity and group differences influence how individuals and communities approach aging, and they also determine access to resources. Two major observations support this argument. First, it is well-documented that being part of a minority group defines in fundamental ways the access individuals have to healthcare, social resources, and societal opportunity structures—often starting at birth (Whitfield, Thorpe, & Szanton, 2011). Therefore, individuals from minority backgrounds often have a lifelong history of being exposed to disparity, resulting in accumulated disadvantages in education and employment, health and healthcare, and upward social mobility over the life course (Ferraro, Kemp, & Williams, 2017; Whitfield et al., 2011).

Second, if a person with one or more characteristics of diversity lives into old age, there is an increased likelihood that he or she will be exposed to multiple risk factors. To illustrate, the health and well-being of an elderly Hispanic/Latino woman living in a small rural community in the Midwest will not only be determined by her racial/ethnic minority status, but also by the geographic location (e.g., poorer access to healthcare and social services), her gender, and her socio-economic status (education, employment, income), resulting in a fourfold jeopardy. Thus, in a society that will increase in diversity in the coming decades, it is of utmost importance to define diversity in terms of multiple factors and to recognize that these factors interact with each other in complex ways as individuals grow old(er) (Mehrotra & Wagner, 2019).

How can the transformation into a majority-minority nation inform the new societal narrative on aging in the U.S.? First, the emerging new narrative on aging will need to incorporate research findings based on minority groups, including racially and ethnically diverse adults, adults with different immigration and acculturation status, adults living in different geographic regions, and adults with diverse lifestyles, including diverse sexual orientations. Current evidence suggests that members from these diverse groups have unique physical and psychological risk profiles (Alvarez et al., 2019) but also unique resources and resilience factors (Fredriksen-Goldsen, Shiu, Bryan, Goldsen, & Kim, 2017) that require different individual and societal planning for the future. Thus, the new narrative on aging cannot simply be a narrative based on findings from white, middle-class Americans; it needs to incorporate findings from research on minority groups.

Second, conducting systematic research with middle-aged and older adults from minority groups also presents the opportunity to learn about resilience factors that are unique to these groups that could possibly inform initiatives for the entire population. For example, it is well-documented that foreign-born members of racial/ethnic groups often have better mental health than their US-born counterparts, a pattern referred to as the “immigrant paradox” (Alvarez et al., 2019). Similarly, a lesson that may be learned from studies in the LGBT community is that although exposure to stigma and discrimination has its challenges and risks, under certain conditions it may also become a source for stronger identity affirmation, the formation of stronger social relationships, and the impetus for resilience (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al., 2017). Thus, by studying and recognizing the strengths of minority groups, including their cultural traditions and practices, researchers may be able to gain deeper insights into pathways of risk and resilience that could be helpful to the entire aging population (Fredriksen-Goldsen et al., 2017).

Lastly, including members from minority groups in systematic and representative research studies will also help to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the key processes of physical, cognitive, and social-emotional aging in these populations. This includes, but is not limited to, processes of physical and behavioral plasticity, the role and impact of different types of social relationships, the ways in which physical, behavioral and social factors interact to lead to certain developmental outcomes, and the specific service needs of individuals and communities (Ferraro et al., 2017; Torres-Gil & Angel, 2018). Such a comprehensive understanding will form a stronger foundation for the new narrative on aging, including the understanding that aging comes with unique challenges, opportunities, and responsibilities. Well-trained psychologists have a particular role to play in making these opportunities accessible—including accessibility for aging individuals in minority groups.

The Role of Psychologists in Creating the New Narrative on Aging
This section discusses the role psychologists can play in establishing the new narrative on aging, with a strong focus on promoting healthy and productive aging. In brief, we propose that psychologists play a key role in getting the message across that growing old(er) in the U.S. in the 21st century is not the same old business anymore, and that individuals have more control over their aging than they believe.

Several reasons underscore the unique role of psychologists in establishing a new narrative on aging—a narrative that applies to individuals and society alike. First, psychologists have been on the forefront of generating much of the scientific evidence that debunked the three most important misconceptions the general public holds with regard to aging. This evidence includes, but is not limited to, research that documents (a) the tremendous amount of behavioral (Hertzog et al., 2009; Schaie & Willis, 1986) and neural plasticity in adulthood (Erickson et al., 2011; Lindenberger, 2014; Stillman et al., 2016); (b) the undermining effects of negative age stereotypes (Levy, 2009); and (c) the positive socio-emotional and personality development across the adult lifespan (Carstensen et al., 2011; Roberts & Mroczek, 2008). Furthermore, cognitive and human factors psychologists have been instrumental in creating technologies that empower older adults, support psychological well-being, and extend independent living (Rogers & Fiske, 2010).

We suggest that psychologists play a particularly important role in the area of health promotion and behavior change research. Not only have psychologists been instrumental in developing major theories of behavior change and behavior change techniques (Schwarzer, Lippke, & Luszczynska, 2011), but these theories and techniques can also be applied to optimize healthy aging. Lachman and colleagues (2018) illustrate how findings from psychological research on control beliefs, goal planning, self-regulation, and social support are critical elements in designing, implementing, and evaluating personalized intervention programs to increase adults’ engagement in physical activity and other healthy behaviors. This kind of translational research will be instrumental in changing the narrative on aging.

Moreover, psychologists are well versed in the application of “slice of life methods,” such as ecological momentary assessment or experience sampling, that may revolutionize how behavior change programs are delivered in real life and evaluated in the future (Smyth, Juth, Ma, & Sliwinksi, 2017). In combination with statistical expertise in the analysis of intensive repeated measures data and complex longitudinal data, research psychologists are extremely well equipped to lead the multidisciplinary teams that are needed to generate the data that can inform how individuals can optimize their aging in the 21st century.

Second, psychologists are particularly qualified to do research on how implicit or explicit interventions can modify negative age stereotypes and on how the effects of such interventions may support positive behavior change. Several studies provide evidence that this represents a promising avenue. For example, Levy, Pilver, Chung, and Slade (2014) showed that an implicit-age-stereotype intervention made older adults’ age stereotypes more positive and this change, in turn, predicted improved physical functioning. Similarly, Brothers and Diehl (2017) showed that an explicit views-of-aging intervention significantly improved participants’ negative views of aging and increased their engagement in physical activity. In sum, there is good reason to believe that adults’ negative age stereotypes and negative views of aging are not immutable; they can be modified with potentially great benefits for individuals’ long-term health and well-being.

Third, psychologists serve important roles in education and training of a variety of health professions, including their own, and, therefore, have the opportunity to influence the content of curricula and practices in institutions of higher education and in applied settings. In particular, the training of geropsychologists (Knight, Karel, Hinrichsen, Qualls, & Duffy, 2009) and health psychologists is critically important because the majority of age-related chronic diseases can be avoided or reduced through healthy lifestyles (Johnson & Acabchuk, 2018), and mental health issues in late-life can often be successfully addressed through psychological counseling (Segal, Qualls, & Smyer, 2011). Moreover, because of their knowledge and understanding of minority aging, psychologists are also in an excellent position to address the unique needs, resources and resilience factors of older adults in different ethnic and cultural groups, as well as the specific disparities and challenges these groups experience (Mehrotra & Wagner, 2019).

Fourth, psychologists also play a key role as members of integrated healthcare teams, including teams that serve aging individuals, families, and communities (Areán & Gum, 2013). Therefore, psychologists are uniquely positioned to infuse the preventative and clinical healthcare of middle-aged and older adults with up-to-date knowledge, including information on the role of lifestyle factors in preventing or delaying chronic disease (Areán & Gum, 2013).

Lastly, psychologists can also play a critical role in the planning and implementing of public health initiatives (Leviton, 1996) related to healthy adult development and aging, and informing social policies that affect the lives of adults (Halpern, 2015; McKnight, Sechrest, & McKnight, 2005). Because the implementation of public health initiatives and social policies requires an evidence base, psychologists play a critical role in the generation, interpretation, and translation of the needed evidence. For example, psychologists have researched how message framing influences individuals’ responses to health care messages (Akl et al., 2011). Findings from this research can be used to design and implement public health initiatives related to the optimization of positive aging and in support of a new narrative on aging.

Conclusion
The major objective of this article was to show that middle-aged and older adults have plenty of reasons to be optimistic and proactive about their aging. In a good sense, growing old(er) is not the same old business anymore. Although a unique combination of genetic, environmental, behaviors, and socio-cultural factors shapes each person’s aging process, decades of biomedical and psychological research have shown that growing old(er) is developmentally more open than previously thought (Hertzog et al., 2009; Lindenberger, 2014). This also means that, more than ever before, individuals have the opportunity and the personal responsibility to take control of their own aging.

The general public’s views of aging do not reflect these good news based on scientific evidence, however; they have remained mostly negative and pessimistic (Levy, 2017; Lindland et al., 2015). Negative views of aging are dangerous because they are associated with a host of negative outcomes and they keep individuals from engaging in health-promoting behaviors (Levy & Myers, 2004). Because of this overall situation, a new narrative on aging is needed. The main purpose of this new narrative on aging is to show individuals the choices and opportunities they have without downplaying the challenges that accompany the process of growing old(er). Moreover, such a new narrative on aging also needs to take into account the increasing diversity of the U.S. society. This latter point is important because in the second half of the 21st century, individuals from previous minority groups will become the majority in U.S. society and a large number of these individuals will grow into old age (Torres-Gil & Angel, 2018).

Of course, changing the current loss- and decline-oriented narrative on aging will not happen overnight. Cultural and social change takes time, as other socio-cultural movements in the U.S. have shown. However, we are optimistic that initiatives like ‘Reframing Aging’ will gain momentum and will facilitate the adoption of more positive views of aging. Well-trained psychologists, especially psychologists who are actively involved in aging research and interdisciplinary work, will be critically important for the success of establishing the new narrative on aging.

Public Significance Statement:
This article shows that the general public’s negative views of aging reflect three big misconceptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. To change the general public’s views of aging will require changing individuals’ views of aging and developing a new societal narrative on aging—a narrative that incorporates the increasing diversity of the general population. Psychologists have a great deal to contribute to this long-term effort.

Acknowledgments
Manfred Diehl’s work on this article was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Aging, R01AG051723.

Biographies
graphic file with name nihms-1063958-b0001.gif

Manfred Diehl

graphic file with name nihms-1063958-b0002.gif

Michael A. Smyer

graphic file with name nihms-1063958-b0003.gif

Chandra M. Mehrotra

Footnotes
1According to a 2018 survey of the Kaiser Family Foundation, 53% of small firms and 82% of large firms offer a program in at least one of the following areas: smoking cessation, weight management, and behavioral or lifestyle change (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2018)
Contributor Information
Manfred Diehl, Colorado State University.

Michael A. Smyer, Bucknell University

Chandra M. Mehrotra, College of St. Scholastica

References
Akl EA, Oxman AD, Herrin J, Vist GE, Terrenato I, Sperati F, … Schünemann H (2011). Framing of health information messages. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12, CD006777 10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Alvarez K, Fillbrunn M, Green JG, Jackson JS, Kessler RC, McLauglin KA, …, & Alegría M (2019). Race/ethnicity, nativity, and lifetime risk of mental disorders in US adults. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 54, 553–565. 10.1007/s00127-018-1644-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Anderson ND, Damianakis T, Kröger E, Wagner LM, Dawson DR, Binns MA, … The BRAVO Team (2014). The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: A critical review and recommendations for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1505–1533. 10.1037/a0037610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Areán PA, & Gum AM (2013). Psychologists at the table in health care reform: The case of geropsychology and integrated care. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44, 142–149. 10.1037/a0031083 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, … Willis SL (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 2271–2281. 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baltes PB, & Smith J (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology, 49, 123–135. 10.1159/000067946 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Barnett JH, Hachinski V, & Blackwell AD (2013). Cognitive health begins at conception: Addressing dementia as a lifelong and preventable condition. BMC Medicine, 11, 246–251. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/246 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Baumgart M, Snyder HM, Carrillo MC, Fazio S, Kim H, & Johns H (2015). Summary of the evidence on modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia: A population-based perspective. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 11, 718–726. 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Brothers AF, & Diehl M (2017). Feasibility and efficacy of the AgingPLUS program: Changing views on aging to increase engagement in physical activity. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 25, 402–411. 10.1123/japa.2016-0039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Busso DS, Volmert A, & Kendall-Taylor N (2019). Reframing aging: Effect of a short-term framing intervention on implicit measures of age bias. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74, 559–564. 10.1093/geronb/gby080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Canadian Broadcasting Company (2017). Stop dehumanizing old people by using the phrase “grey tsunami.” Retrieved from www.cbc.ca/radio/thesundayedition/the-sunday-edition-october-15-2017-1.4353223/stop-dehumanizing-old-people-by-using-the-phrase-grey-tsunami-1.4353251
Carlson MC, Erickson KI, Kramer AF, Voss MW, Bolea N, Mielke M, … Fried LP (2009). Evidence for neurocognitive plasticity in at-risk older adults: The Experience Corps program. The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 64A, 1275–1282. 10.1093/gerona/glp117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Carstensen LL (2011). A long bright future: Happiness, health, and financial security in an age of increased longevity. New York, NY: Public Affairs. [Google Scholar]
Carstensen LL, Turan B, Scheibe S, Ram N, Ersner-Hershfield H, Samanez-Larkin GR, Brooks KP, & Nesselroade JR (2011). Emotional experience improves with age: Evidence based on over 10 years of experience sampling. Psychology and Aging, 26, 21–33. 10.1037/a0021285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Census Bureau (2015). New Census Bureau report analyzes U.S. population projections. Retrieved from www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-tps16.html
Charles ST, & Carstensen LL (2014). Emotion regulation and aging In Gross JJ (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 203–218). New York, NY: Guilford Press. [Google Scholar]
Charles ST, Reynolds CA, & Gatz M (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 136–151. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Colcombe S, & Kramer AF (2003). Fitness effects on the cognitive function of older adults: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Science, 14, 125–130. 10.1111/1467-9289.t01-1-01430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cornwell B, Laumann EO, & Schumm LP (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73, 185–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Corporation for National and Community Service (2016). Value of senior volunteers to U.S. economy estimated at $77 billion. Retrieved from www.nationalservice.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/value-senior-volunteers-us-economy-estimated-77billion
Crimmins EM (2015). Lifespan and healthspan: Past, present, and promise. The Gerontologist, 55, 901–911. 10.1093/geront/gnv130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Crimmins EM, Zhang Y, & Saito Y (2016). Trends over 4 decades in disability-free life expectancy in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 1287–1293. 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
DeNisco A (2016). Myth busted: Older workers are just as tech-savvy as younger ones, says new survey. TechRepublic. Retrieved from http://www.techrepublic.com/article/myth-busted-older-workers-are-just-as-tech-savvy-as-younger-ones-says-new-survey/ [Google Scholar]
Diehl M, Chui H, Hay EL, Lumley MA, Grühn D, & Labouvie-Vief G (2014). Change in coping and defense mechanisms across adulthood: Longitudinal findings in a European American sample. Developmental Psychology, 50, 634–648. 10.1037/a0033619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Diehl M, & Wahl H-W (2010). Awareness of age-related change: Examination of a (mostly) unexplored concept. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Social Sciences, 65B, 340–350. 10.1093/geronb/gbp11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
DiPietro L (2001). Physical activity in aging: Changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function. The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56A (Special Issue II), 13–22. 10.1093/gerona/56.suppl_2.13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash RS, Basak C, Szabo A, Chaddock L, … Kramer AF (2011). Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3017–3022. 10.1073/pnas.1015950108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ferraro KF, Kemp BR, & Williams MM (2017). Diverse aging and health inequality by race and ethnicity. Innovation in Aging. Advance access publication May 26, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Fredriksen-Goldsen KI, Shiu C, Bryan AEB, Goldsen J, & Kim H-J (2017). Health equity and aging of bisexual older adults: Pathways of risk and resilience. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Social Sciences, 72, 468–478. http://dx.doi.org/geronb/gbw120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gerstorf D, Ram N, Mayraz G, Hidajat M, Lindenberger U, Wagner GG, & Schupp J (2010). Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Something is seriously wrong at the end of life. Psychology and Aging, 25, 477–485. 10.1037/a0017543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gill TM, Guo Z, & Allore HG (2008). Subtypes of disability in older persons over the course nearly 8 years. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 436–443. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01603.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gill TM, Murphy TE, Barry LC, & Allore HG (2009). Risk factors for disability subtypes in older persons. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 57, 1850–1855. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02443.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Gonzales E, Matz-Costa C, & Morrow-Howell N (2015). Increasing opportunities for the productive engagement of older adults: A response to population aging. The Gerontologist, 55, 252–261. 10.1093/geront/gnu176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Halpern D (2015). The rise of psychology in policy: The UK’s de facto Council of Psychological Science Advisers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 768–771. 10.1177/1745691615609917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hardy SE, & Gill TM (2004). Recovery from disability among community-dwelling older persons. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 1596–1602. 10.1001/jama.291.13.1596 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hay EL, & Diehl M (2011). Emotion complexity and emotion regulation across adulthood. European Journal of Ageing, 8, 157–168. 10.1007/s10433-011-0191-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hedge JW, Borman WC, & Lammlein SE (2006). The aging workforce: Realities, myths, and implications for organizations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. [Google Scholar]
Hertzog C, Kramer AF, Wilson RS, & Lindenberger U (2009). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hess TM, Hinson JT, & Statham JA (2004). Explicit and implicit stereotype activation effects on memory: Do age and awareness moderate the impact of priming? Psychology and Aging, 19, 495–505. 10.1037/088207974.19.3.495 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, Kroenke CH, & Colditz GA (2005). Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 293, 2479–2486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hong AR, & Kim SW (2018). Effects of resistance exercise on bone health. Endocrinology and Metabolism, 33, 435–444. 10.3803/EnM.2018.33.4.435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Infurna FJ, & Okun MA (2015). Antecedents and outcomes of level and rates of change in perceived control: The moderating role of age. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1420–1437. 10.1037/a0039530 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
James JB, Matz-Costa C, & Smyer MA (2016). Retirement security: It’s not just about the money. American Psychologist, 71, 334–344. 10.1037/a0040220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Johnson BT, & Acabchuk RL (2018). What are the keys to a longer, happier life? Answers from five decades of health psychology research. Social Science & Medicine, 196, 218–226. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kaiser Family Foundation (2018). Employer health benefits: 2018 Survey. San Francisco, CA: Author. [Google Scholar]
Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merakangas KR, & Walters EE (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 593–602. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Knight BG, Karel MJ, Hinrichsen GA, Qualls SH, & Duffy M (2009). Pikes Peak model for training in professional geropsychology. American Psychologist, 64, 205–214. 10.1037/a0015059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kotter-Grühn D, Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn A, & Gerstorf D (2009). Self-perceptions of aging predict mortality and change with approaching death: 16-year longitudinal results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 24, 654–667. 10.1037/a0016510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kramer AF, & Erickson KI (2007). Effects of physical activity on cognition, well-being, and brain: Human interventions. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 3, S45–S51. 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lachman ME, Lipsitz L, Lubben J, Castaneda-Sceppa C, & Jette AM (2018). When adults don’t exercise: Behavioral strategies to increase physical activity in sedentary middle-aged and older adults. Innovation in Aging, 2, 1–12. 10.1093/geroni/igy007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Leviton LC (1996). Integrating psychology and public health: Challenges and opportunities. American Psychologist, 51, 42–51. 10.1037/0003-066X.51.1.42 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Levy B (2009). Stereotype embodiment: A psychosocial approach to aging. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 332–336. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01662.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Levy BR (2017). Age-stereotype paradox: Opportunity for social change. The Gerontologist, 57(Suppl. 2), S118–S126. 10.1093/geront/gnx059 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Levy BR, & Leifheit-Limson E (2009). The stereotype-matching effect: Greater influence on functioning when age stereotypes correspond to outcomes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 230–233. 10.1037/a0014563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Levy BR, & Myers LM (2004). Preventive health behaviors influenced by self-perceptions of aging. Preventive Medicine, 39, 625–629. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Levy BR, Pilver C, Chung PH, & Slade MD (2014). Subliminal strengthening: Improving older individuals’ physical function over time with an implicit-age-stereotype intervention. Psychological Science, 25, 2127–2135. 10.1177/0956797614551970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Levy BR, Slade MD, Kunkel SR, & Kasl SV (2002). Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 261–270. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Levy BR, Slade MD, Murphy TE, & Gill TM (2012). Association between positive age stereotypes and recovery from disability in older persons. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 308, 1972–1973. 10.1001/jama.2012.14541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lieberman T (2013). The enduring myth of the Greedy Geezer. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from http://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/the_enduring_myth_of_the_greed.php [Google Scholar]
Lindenberger U (2014). Human cognitive aging: Corriger la fortune? Science, 346, 572–578. 10.1126/science.1254403 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lindland E, Fond M, Haydon A, & Kendall-Taylor N (2015). Gauging aging: Mapping the gaps between expert and public understandings of aging in America. Washington, DC: FrameWorks Institute. [Google Scholar]
Löckenhoff CE, De Fruyt F, Terracciano A, McCrae RR, De Bolle M, Costa PT, … Yik M (2009). Perceptions of aging across 26 cultures and their culture-level associates. Psychology and Aging, 24, 941–954. 10.1037/a0016901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lövdén M, Bäckman L, Lindenberger U, Schaefer S, & Schmiedek F (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 4, 659–676. 10.1037/a0020080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Martin GM, Bergman A, & Barzilai N (2007). Genetic determinants of human health span and life span: Progress and new opportunities. PLoS Genetics, 3(7), e125 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Matz-Costa C, Carr DC, McNamara TK, & James JB (2016). Physical, cognitive, social and emotional mediators of activity involvement and health in later life. Research on Aging, 38, 791–815. 10.1177/0164027515606182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
McKnight KM, Sechrest L, & McKnight PE (2005). Psychology, psychologists, and public policy. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 557–576. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mehrotra CM, & Wagner LS (2019). Aging and diversity: An active learning experience (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Mroczek DK, & Kolarz CM (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
National Alliance for Caregiving & AARP (2015). Caregiving in the U.S. 2015. Retrieved from www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2015/caregiving-in-the-united-states-2015-report-revised.pdf
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2019). About chronic diseases. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/index.htm
Nelson TD (2016). Promoting healthy aging by confronting ageism. American Psychologist, 71, 276–282. 10.1037/a0040221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Officer A, & de la Fuente-Núñez V (2018). A global campaign to combat ageism. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 96, 299–300. 10.2471/BLT.17.202424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Olshansky SJ, Perry D, Miller RA, & Butler RN (2006). Pursuing the longevity dividend: Scientific goals for an aging world. Annals of the New York Academic of Sciences, 1114, 11–13. 10.1196/annals.1396.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Park DC, Lodi-Smith J, Drew L, Haber S, Hebrank A, Bischof GN, & Aamodt W (2014). The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: The Synapse Project. Psychological Science, 25, 103–112. 10.1177/0956797613499592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Perron R (2018). The value of experience: Age discrimination against older workers persists. Washington, DC: AARP; 10.26419/res.00177.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Pew Research Center (2013). At grandmother’s house we stay. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2013/09/grandparents_report_final_2013.pdf
Pitt-Catsouphes M, James JB, & Matz-Costa C (2015). Workplace-based health and wellness programs: The intersection of aging, work, and health. The Gerontologist, 55, 262–270. 10.1093/geront/gnu114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rebok GW, Ball K, Guey LT, Jones RN, Kim H-Y, King JW, … Willis SL (2014). Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62, 16–24. 10.1111/jgs.12607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Roberts BW, & Mroczek D (2008). Personality trait change in adulthood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 31–35. 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Robinson SA, & Lachman ME (2017). Perceived control and aging: A mini-review and directions for future research. Gerontology, 63, 435–442. 10.1159/000468540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Rogers WA, & Fisk AD (2010). Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences, 65B, 645–653. 10.1093/geronb/gbq065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Sargent-Cox KA, Anstey KJ, & Luszcz MA (2012). Change in health and self-perceptions of aging over 16 years: The role of psychological resources. Health Psychology, 31, 423–432. 10.1037/a0027464 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schaie KW (2013). Developmental influences on adult intelligence: The Seattle Longitudinal Study (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Schaie KW, & Willis SL (1986). Can decline in adult intellectual functioning be reversed? Developmental Psychology, 22, 223–232. 10.1037/0012-1649.22.2.223 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Schwarzer R, Lippke S, & Luszczynska A (2011). Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: The Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabilitation Psychology, 56, 161–170. 10.1037/a0024509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Segal DL, Qualls SH, & Smyer MA (2011). Aging and mental health (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Wasserman DH, Castaneda-Sceppa C, & White RD (2006). Physical activity/exercise and Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 29, 1433–1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Smyth JM, Juth V, Ma J, & Sliwinski M (2017). A slice of life: Ecologically valid methods for research on social relationships and health across the life span. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, e12356 10.1111/spc3.12356 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Stillman CM, Cohen J, Lehman ME, & Erickson KI (2016). Mediators of physical activity on neurocognitive function: A review at multiple levels of analysis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 626 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Stine-Morrow EAL, Parisi JM, Morrow DG, & Park DC (2008). The effects of an engaged lifestyle on cognitive vitality: A field experiment. Psychology and Aging, 23, 778–786. 10.1037/a0014341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Torres-Gil F, & Angel JL (Eds.). (2018). The politics of a majority-minority nation: Aging, diversity, and immigration. New York, NY: Springer Publishing. [Google Scholar]
Tucker-Drob EM, & Briley DA (2014). Continuity of genetic and environmental influences on cognition across the life span: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 949–979. 10.1037/a0035893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Whitfield KE, Thorpe R, & Szanton S (2011). Health disparities, social class, and aging In Schaie KW & Willis SL (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th ed., pp. 207–218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 10.1016/8978-0-12-380882-000013-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Willis SL, & Belleville S, (2016). Cognitive training in later adulthood In Schaie KW & Willis SL (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (8th ed., pp. 217–243). San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 10.1016/B978-0-12-411469-2.00012-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, Ball K, Elias J, Koepke KM, … ACTIVE Study Group (2006). Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 2805–2814. 10.1001/jama.296.23.2805 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
----
 * Feeling old? Your molecules change rapidly around ages 44 and 60
 * Shifts in abundance of over 135,000 types of molecules and microbes related to age did not occur gradually over time, but clustered around two ages, a study showed.
www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2024/08/14/midlife-change-aging-study/

 * Scientists find humans age dramatically in two bursts – at 44, then 60
 * US findings suggesting ageing is not a slow and steady process could explain spikes in health issues at certain ages
www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/aug/14/scientists-find-humans-age-dramatically-in-two-bursts-at-44-then-60-aging-not-slow-and-steady
 

 * “¿Te sentís viejo?”: una investigación fijó a partir de qué edad se producen profundos cambios moleculares
 * www.lanacion.com.ar/sociedad/te-sentis-viejo-una-investigacion-fijo-a-partir-de-que-edad-se-producen-profundos-cambios-nid20082024/

 * Why Aging Comes in Dramatic Waves in Our 40s and 60s
 * A new study suggests that waves of aging-related changes occur at two distinct points in our life
www.scientificamerican.com/article/drastic-molecular-shifts-in-peoples-40s-and-60s-might-explain-age-related/

 *Feeling Suddenly Older? Scientists See Aging ‘Waves’ at 44 and 60*
 * New research suggests age-related changes aren’t as gradual and linear as we thought
 * www.wsj.com/health/wellness/feeling-suddenly-older-scientists-see-aging-waves-at-44-and-60-1a3fd814
+
 * www.tovima.com/wsj/aging-feeling-suddenly-older-scientists-see-aging-waves-at-44-and-60/
>
 * Evidence from omics that aging is not a gradual, linear process. The new study, highlighted here, only assessed people up to age 75 among 108 participants with short term follow-up (1.7 yrs). A previous large study (N>4,200, up to age 95) found a 3rd peak at age 80.
 * https://x.com/EricTopol/status/1831342289790357505

>>>>
 * Nonlinear dynamics of multi-omics profiles during human aging*
 * www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00692-2