GRACIAS AGEING.2.0, GRACIAS ALICIA MOWSKOSKI. ANA GAMBACCINI, GRACIAS UNIVERSIDAD DE BELGRANO, GRACIAS DOCTORA PORTO Y LEONARDO GARABIETA. Lo que ustedes hacen es pionerismo de pura cepa. Es innovación en acción porque la economía plateada es la economía del futuro.

DARÉ ALGUNAS PINCELADAS sobre la GESTIÓN DE LA LONGEVIDAD

Segundo, los prejuicios sociales sobre que la creatividad y el emprendedurismo son cosas de personas jóvenes y el EDADISMO AUTOINFLIGIDO deben ser afrontados conjuntamente. Sobre este punto y de manera concreta les pido que se sumen al movimiento iberoamericano stop edadismo, que impulsa la Fundación ASISPA de España, simplemente poniendo numeralStopEdismo, uno adhiere simplemente firmando allí. Tercero, tendríamos que comprender que cuando hablamos de economía plateada estamos diciendo, no solo que hay que incorporar a las personas mayores como prosumidoras, emprendedoras y contribuidoras, estamos diciendo que se requiere una transformación profunda, tenemos que pensar en el futuro del bienestar como promueve Sebastián Campanario y tiene que ser una economía diferente a la que conocemos. Tenemos que adquirir nuevas palabras, nuevos lenguajes económicos más asociados con la vida y la felicidad pública. La buena noticia es que frente a la incertidumbre del momento actual, sabemos que la mejor manera de predecir nuestro futuro es construirlo juntos. Gracias de nuevo.



Emprendedurismo Senior

EMPRENDEDURISMO EN URUGUAY

EMPRENDER HASTA LOS 90

CONTINUANDO LA EXPLORACIÓN DEL EMPRENDEDURISMO


anhttps://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf

ecosistemas emprendedores plantea varios desafíos para los responsables de la formulación de políticas. Hay varios generales que deben seguirse. La intervención política debe adoptar un enfoque holístico, centrándose en lo siguiente: los actores emprendedores dentro del ecosistema; el recurso proveedores dentro del ecosistema; conectores empresariales dentro del ecosistema y el entorno emprendedor del ecosistema. Finalmente, es importante que los formuladores de políticas desarrollen métricas para determinar las fortalezas y debilidades de los ecosistemas individuales para que se pueden evaluar esas fortalezas y debilidades, para identificar si hay que intervenir y cómo intervenir, y monitorear con el tiempo la eficacia de dichas intervenciones. Qué medir, enfoques de la medición y el acceso a los datos en las escalas geográficas apropiadas plantean desafíos formidables.

ecosystem matures the need to help firms with organisational development, human capital development, internationalisation support and access to growth capital will increase.

supply of venture capital is unlikely to be effective if there is no deal flow. Encouraging more people to create start-ups is likely to have little impact if many occur in low growth areas. Introducing entrepreneurship education will be ineffective if graduates move to more conducive entrepreneurial environments. Policy implementation has to be holistic.

approaches. Appropriate framework conditions are essential. For example, immigration laws should not provide a barrier to the attraction of talented individuals. Property rights need to be enshrined. Both corporate and individual taxation needs to provide appropriate incentives both to reward risk-taking and encourage reinvestment. On the other hand, grants and subsidies should be avoided as they may distort entrepreneurial behaviour. But there also a need for ‘bottom up’ initiatives to improve the environmFORA sees this as providing the ‘glue’ to connect the various actors in the ecosystem. Moreover, these bottom up initiatives should not be seen as the exclusive responsibly of government. As noted earlier, Feld strongly argues that the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems requires active input from the entrepreneurial community. FORA argues that strong support from the major businesses in the ecosystem is also essential and, critically, that such involvement is motivated by commercial, rather than corporate social responsibility, considerations (Ebdrup, 2013). Yet policy-makers rarely seek to engage with the larger firms in the ecosystem. Isenberg (2012) sees the possibility of ‘tipping points’ when ecosystems become self-sustaining, thereby enabling government involvement to be significantly reduced.

policies. Small business policy is a rather scattergun approach which focuses on increasing the number of business start-ups. Shane (2009) has memorably described this approach as ‘bad public policy’ on account of their limited growth, short survival and high failure rates and high displacement of the vast majority of start-ups. Nevertheless, this approach is deeply embedded in public policy (Nightingale and Coad, 2014). Entrepreneurship policy, in contrast, is concerned with supporting businesses with high growth potential. Such firms are more likely to require relational rather than transactional assistance. Moreover, they are likely to benefit most from peer-based support (Fischer and Reuber, 2003; Mason and Brown, 2013) on account of the greater opportunities for experiential learning and tacit knowledge sharing. Moreover, in view of the “idiosyncratic and unstable” nature of firm growth (Vinell and Hamilton, 1999) such support needs to be time-sensitive, aimed at supporting firms that have experienced ‘growth triggers’ and therefore experiencing systemic changes to their structure and workings (Brown and Mawson, 2012).

HGFs rather than basing them on stereotypes (Mason and Brown, 2013; Brown et al, 2014). At least ‘six myths’ can be identified (Brown et al, 2014): HGFs are not all new/young; they are not predominantly in high tech sectors; universities are not a major source of HGFs; few HGFs are venture capital-backed; they do not exhibit liner growth – fast growth is episodic; and they do not only grow organically – acquisition is also significant.

We propose a taxonomy which recognises four aspects of the entrepreneurial ecosystem that can be targeted by policy makers (both national and regional). These are as follows:  entrepreneurial actors within ecosystems  entrepreneurial resource providers within ecosystems  entrepreneurial connectors within ecosystems  entrepreneurial orientation with ecosystems


SILVIA ZWEIFEL- ECONOMÍA AMABLE

La innovación cultural es la renovación crucial hoy A los 3 años ella creía que las nueces llovían del cielo. Aprendió lo que son los paradigmas, Podríamos vivir mucho mejor que lo que estamos viviendo. Los conocimiento están pero las creencias no acompañan. Qué es la economía, amable es aquello que conduce al amor. Amabilidad es amor en acción. En sentipensarhacer Eduardo Galeano,


EJEMPLOS DE EMPRENDEDURISMO SENIOR



EL EMPRENDEDOR INBATIBLE


EnciclopediaRelacionalDinamica: EmprendedurismoSenior (última edición 2023-12-12 20:07:40 efectuada por MercedesJones)